Comparative Analysis of Traditional and Alternative Engines: Advancements and Impacts on Sustainability

Authors

  • Ruide Ma

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/kvga6d04

Keywords:

Traditional internal combustion engines, alternative engines, sustainable development.

Abstract

Traditional internal combustion engines (ICEs) have accompanied humans for a long time and have developed to contain good performance and high reliability. However, the emissions of traditional engines play a big role in environmental pollution, which goes against the most important tenet of human development—sustainable development. To radically deal with this concern, alternative engines have been invented and developed these years instead of further study of traditional engines. Alternative engines, including hybrid, fuel cell, and electric engines, are designed to convert energies from renewable resources to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Alternative engines are also beneficial for saving costs of fuel because of their higher fuel efficiency, which is a valuable factor for choosing a vehicle with such an engine as the family car. Each kind of alternative engine has its drawbacks, such as the high maintenance rate of hybrid engines, limited driving range of battery electric vehicles (EVs), and possibly high GHG emissions of fuel cells. These are factors for the comparison of engines and should be considered when choosing an engine that is suitable for a specific situation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Yan Xiaoyu, Crookes Roy J. Energy demand and emissions from road transportation vehicles in China. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2010, 36(6): 651-676.

[2] Zheng Xu, Jie Qiu, Ziqing Zhang, et al. Combustion Development and Efficiency Improvement for Hybrid Engines, SAE Technical Paper, 2024, 2024-01-2093.

[3] Ran Jing, Chen Yuan, Hamidreza Rezaei, et al. Assessments on energy and greenhouse gas emissions of internal combustion engine automobiles and electric automobiles in the USA. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2020, 90: 297-309.

[4] L.D. Danny Harvey. Rethinking electric vehicle subsidies, rediscovering energy efficiency. Energy Policy Journal, 2020, 146: 111760.

[5] Linda Carrette, K. Andreas Friedrich, & Ulrich Stimming. Fuel cells: principles, types, fuels, and applications. ChemPhysChem, 2000, 1(4), 162-193.

[6] Abhishek Upadhyay, Mihir Dalal, Naman Sanghvi, et al. Electric vehicles over contemporary combustion engines. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2021, 635: 012004.

[7] Chris Mi & M. Abul Masrur. Hybrid electric vehicles: Principles and applications with practical perspectives. John Wiley & Sons, 2017.

[8] Sonja Haustein, Anders Fjendbo Jensen, Elisabetta Cherchi. Battery electric vehicle adoption in Denmark and Sweden: Recent changes, related factors and policy implications. Energy Policy, 2021, 149, 112096

[9] Wang Fu, Deng Shuai, Zhang Houcheng, et al. A comprehensive review on high-temperature fuel cells with carbon capture. Applied Energy, 2020, 275, 115342.

[10] Razan El Kassar, Ahmad Al Takash, Jalal Faraj, et al. Recent advances in lithium-ion battery integration with thermal management systems for electric vehicles: A summary review. Journal of Energy Storage, 2024, 91, 112061.

Downloads

Published

11-12-2024

How to Cite

Ma, R. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Traditional and Alternative Engines: Advancements and Impacts on Sustainability. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, 119, 44-49. https://doi.org/10.54097/kvga6d04