Building a Diagnostic Standard for Alzheimer’s Disease Based on Decision Trees and Analyzing Key Factors with Random Forests

Authors

  • Yang Tang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/5ym6g294

Keywords:

Machine learning, Decision tree, Random forest, Classifying.

Abstract

Research Background and Significance: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a widespread neurodegenerative disorder that poses a significant threat to the health of millions of older adults worldwide. Despite the availability of various methods to assess the severity of dementia, the need for a high-precision diagnostic model remains crucial to enhancing patient outcomes. Accurate diagnosis is essential not only for the well-being of individuals but also for the effective management and treatment of the disease. This study aims to address this critical need by developing a more precise diagnostic framework for AD, utilizing advanced machine learning techniques in combination with comprehensive clinical data. Study Contributions: In this research, a decision tree model was constructed based on the principle of information gain, using a meticulously pre-processed sample of 2,149 patients from a public dataset. The model achieved a diagnostic accuracy of 93.47%, markedly outperforming traditional diagnostic methods. Additionally, a random forest model was employed to identify key risk factors influencing AD, such as age and lifestyle habits. These findings not only equip clinicians with more accurate diagnostic tools but also provide a robust scientific foundation for developing AD prevention and treatment strategies. The study also acknowledges its limitations and suggests directions for future research to further improve the diagnosis and understanding of Alzheimer's disease.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Edward Jenner Tettevi, Deryl Nii Okantey Kuevi, Balagra Kasim Sumabe, et al. In Silico Identification of a Potential TNF-Alpha Binder Using a Structural Similarity: A Potential Drug Repurposing Approach to the Management of Alzheimer’s Disease. BioMed Research International, 2024, 1: 2024.

[2] Knopman DS, Amieva H, Petersen RC, et al. Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2021, 7: 33.

[3] Ding Yiming, et al. A Deep Learning Model to Predict a Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease by Using 18F-FDG PET of the Brain. Radiology, 2018, 18 (4): 1598-1695.

[4] Zhu, X., Huang, Y., Wang, X., Wang, R.: 'Emotion recognition based on brain-like multimodal hierarchical perception', Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2024, 83, (18), pp. 56039-56057.

[5] Tanveer M, Richhariya B, Khan RU, et al. Machine learning techniques for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: A review. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl., 2020, 16 (1s): 28.

[6] Zhu X, Guo C, Feng H, et al. A Review of Key Technologies for Emotion Analysis Using Multimodal Information. Cognitive Computation, 2024: 1-27.

[7] Al-Dlaeen D, Alashqur A. Using decision tree classification to assist in the prediction of Alzheimer's disease. In 2014 6th International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology (CSIT), 2014: 122-126.

[8] Song M, Jung H, Lee S, et al. Diagnostic classification and biomarker identification of Alzheimer’s disease with random forest algorithm. Brain Sciences, 2021, 11 (4): 453.

[9] Sun D, Peng H, Wu Z. Establishment and analysis of a combined diagnostic model of Alzheimer’s disease with random forest and artificial neural network. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 2022, 14: 921906.

[10] Dimitriadis SI, Liparas D, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. How random is the random forest? Random forest algorithm on the service of structural imaging biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease: from Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative (ADNI) database. Neural Regeneration Research, 2018, 13 (6): 962-970.

Downloads

Published

24-12-2024

How to Cite

Tang, Y. (2024). Building a Diagnostic Standard for Alzheimer’s Disease Based on Decision Trees and Analyzing Key Factors with Random Forests. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, 123, 90-95. https://doi.org/10.54097/5ym6g294