Progress on High-Performance PEEK Material for 3D Printing

Yiming Geng; Xiaochuan Ma; Xinbei Yu

doi:10.54097/qvt2ka43

Authors

Yiming Geng
Xiaochuan Ma
Xinbei Yu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/qvt2ka43

Keywords:

PEEK material, 3D printing, FDM, SLS, Printing parameter.

Abstract

Amidst the rising demand for lightweight, sturdy, and durable materials across various industries, the research emphasizes the widespread application of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) due to its superior characteristics. This paper inquiry scrutinizes the advanced potential of three-dimensional printing utilizing high-performance PEEK material, with a concentrated examination of the Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) and Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) methodologies. These technologies have been verified to fabricate complex structures and customized components accurately. The analysis investigates how key printing parameters such as printing temperature, bed temperature, laser power, and scanning speed influence the mechanical properties and microstructure of PEEK components. Nonetheless, the study acknowledges the difficulties encountered with FDM and SLS processes, including high-temperature operations, insufficient adhesion, warping deformation, and inconsistent powder density challenges. Addressing these issues is essential to fully harness the advantages of 3D printing with PEEK material. The paper proposes several avenues for future research aimed at mitigating these challenges, such as optimizing printing parameters to enhance stability and component quality, developing improved thermal management systems and print bed surface treatments to boost adhesion and minimize warping, exploring material research for additional 3D printing substances, and refining models based on empirical data to enhance printing precision and efficiency. This study underscores the considerable potential of 3D printing with high-performance PEEK material to transform manufacturing processes, facilitating the production of high-performance components with complex geometries and customized designs, thereby promoting innovation across various industries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Li, J. C. M. Microstructure and Properties of Materials. World Scientific, 1996, 2: 436.

[2] Wang, Y., James, E., and Ghita, O. R. Glass bead filled polyetherketone (PEK) composite by high temperature laser sintering (HT-LS). Materials & Design, 2015, 83: 545-551.

[3] Kadiyala, A. K., and Bijwe, J. Investigations on performance and failure mechanisms of high temperature thermoplastic polymers as adhesives. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2016, 70: 90-101.

[4] Moby, V., Dupagne, L., Fouquet, V., Attal, J. P., François, P., and Dursun, E. Mechanical properties of fused deposition modeling of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and interest for dental restorations: A systematic review. Materials, 2022, 15: 6801.

[5] Yang, K., Shi, W., Sun, X., Hou, W., Hu, J., Zhao, M., and Zou, J. Research and application of ultra-low density and low friction cement slurry technology. In ISOPE International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, ISOPE-I, Ottawa, Canada, 2023.

[6] Shuai, C., Wu, P., Yuan, F., Feng, P., Yang, Y., and Gao, C. Characterization and bioactivity evaluation of (polyetheretherketone/polyglycolic acid)-hydroxyapatite scaffolds for tissue regeneration. Materials, 2016, 9: 934.

[7] Wu, W., Geng, P., Li, G., Zhao, D., Zhang, H., and Zhao, J. Influence of layer thickness and raster angle on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed PEEK and a comparative mechanical study between PEEK and ABS. Materials, 2015, 8: 5834-5846.

[8] Liu, H., Cheng, X., Yang, X. H., Zheng, G. M., and Guo, Q. J. Experimental study on parameters of 3D printing process for PEEK materials. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2019, 504: 012001.

[9] Han, J., Wang, Y. K., Tian, X. Q., Jiang, B. C., and Xia, L. Design and study of fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printing process parameters optimization. Technology and Test, 2016, 6: 139-142.

[10] Peng, W., Bin, Z., Shouling, D., Lei, L., and Huang, C. Effects of FDM-3D printing parameters on mechanical properties and microstructure of CF/PEEK and GF/PEEK. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2021, 34: 236-246.

[11] Pulipaka, A., Gide, K. M., Beheshti, A., and Bagheri, Z. S. Effect of 3D printing process parameters on surface and mechanical properties of FFF-printed PEEK. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2023, 85: 368-386.

[12] El Magri, A., Vanaei, S., and Vaudreuil, S. An overview on the influence of process parameters through the characteristic of 3D-printed PEEK and PEI parts. High Performance Polymers, 2021, 33: 862-880.

[13] Zalaznik, M., Kalin, M., and Novak, S. Influence of the processing temperature on the tribological and mechanical properties of poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) polymer. Tribology International, 2016, 94: 92-97.

[14] Ding, S., Zou, B., Wang, P., and Ding, H. Effects of nozzle temperature and building orientation on mechanical properties and microstructure of PEEK and PEI printed by 3D-FDM. Polymer Testing, 2019, 78: 105948.

[15] Wang, P., Zou, B., and Ding, S. Modeling of surface roughness based on heat transfer considering diffusion among deposition filaments for FDM 3D printing heat-resistant resin. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019, 161: 114064.

[16] Geng, P., Zhao, J., Wu, W., Ye, W., Wang, Y., Wang, S., and Zhang, S. Effects of extrusion speed and printing speed on the 3D printing stability of extruded PEEK filament. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2019, 37: 266-273.

[17] Zhen, H., Zhao, B., Quan, L., and Fu, J. Effect of 3D printing process parameters and heat treatment conditions on the mechanical properties and microstructure of PEEK parts. Polymers, 2023, 15: 2209.

[18] Charoo, N. A., Barakh Ali, S. F., Mohamed, E. M., Kuttolamadom, M. A., Ozkan, T., Khan, M. A., and Rahman, Z. Selective laser sintering 3D printing – an overview of the technology and pharmaceutical applications. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, 2020, 46: 869-877.

[19] Tan, K. H., Chua, C. K., Leong, K. F., Cheah, C. M., Cheang, P., Bakar, M. A., and Cha, S. W. Scaffold development using selective laser sintering of polyetheretherketone–hydroxyapatite bio composite blends. Biomaterials, 2003, 24: 3115-3123.

[20] Snarr, S. E. Mechanical property correlation and laser parameter development for the selective laser sintering of carbon fiber reinforced polyetheretherketone, Ph. D. Thesis, The Universitv of Texas at Austin, 2018.

[21] Zhang, S., Tang, H., Tang, D., Liu, T., and Liao, W. Effect of fabrication process on the microstructure and mechanical performance of carbon fiber reinforced PEEK composites via selective laser sintering. Composites Science and Technology, 2024, 246: 110396.

[22] Han, W., Kong, L., and Xu, M. Advances in selective laser sintering of polymers. International Journal of Extreme Manufacturing, 2022, 4: 042002.

[23] Caulfield, B., McHugh, P. E., and Lohfeld, S. Dependence of mechanical properties of polyamide components on build parameters in the SLS process. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2007, 182: 477-488.

[24] Williams, J. D., and Deckard, C. R. Advances in modeling the effects of selected parameters on the SLS process. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 1998, 4: 90-100.

[25] Fang, F., Zhang, N., Guo, D., Ehmann, K., Cheung, B., Liu, K., and Yamamura, K. Towards atomic and close-to-atomic scale manufacturing. International Journal of Extreme Manufacturing, 2019, 1: 012001.

[26] Zhao, P. Molding of polyether ether ketone (PEEK) and its composites, Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 2024, 1-36.