Comparison of Different Detection Paradigm for WMIPs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/hset.v38i.5828Keywords:
Astrophysics; WMIPs; Detection; CJPL; DAMPE.Abstract
Based on astrophysics observation, dark matter accounts for approximately 84% of all matter in the universe, with the remaining 16% being ordinary matter. According to the prevailing scientific model, dark matter particles are supersymmetric particles with a mass of 100 GeV (about the mass of 100 protons) with the density about 5000 particles m-3. Yet such a dominant substance dominates the universe, but one has not detected yet. Among various candidate, WIMPs are one of the most appealing one that plenty of facilities aim to detect. In this essay, the detection principles and some recent results of two representatives of the state-of-art mainstream detection methods were presented, i.e., the ‘Wukong’ astronomical satellite (DAMPE) and the Jinping Mountains of Sichuan Province, China (CJPL). It was shown that ‘Wukong’ has successfully detected an electron-positron pairs at an energy of 0.9 Tev. In Jinping, experiments are proposed to detect liquid argon dark matter. In this review, the two methods of detecting dark matter will be compared and the advantages, disadvantages will be analyzed. These results shed light on guiding further exploration of dark matter.
Downloads
References
Bertone Gianfranco, Dan Hooper. History of Dark Matter. Reviews of Modern Physics, 2018, vol. 90, no. 4, 15.
Smith P F, Lewin J D. Dark matter detection. Physics Reports, 1990, 187(5): 203-280.
Garrett K, Duda G. Dark matter: A primer. Advances in Astronomy, 2011, 2011.
Einasto J. Dark matter. Brazilian Journal of Physics, 2013, 43(5): 369-374.
NASA. “Dark Energy, Dark Matter | Science Mission Directorate.” Nasa.gov, Nasa, 2012, Retrieved from: science.nasa.gov/astrophysics/focus-areas/what-is-dark-energy.
Pospelov M, Ritz A, Voloshin M. Secluded WIMP dark matter. Physics Letters B, 2008, 662(1): 53-61.
Goldman I, Nussinov S. Weakly interacting massive particles and neutron stars. Physical Review D, 1989, 40(10): 3221.
Akerib D S, Araújo H M, Bai X, et al. Improved limits on scattering of weakly interacting massive particles from reanalysis of 2013 LUX data. Physical review letters, 2016, 116(16): 161301.
Lin, S. T., et al. New Limits on Spin-Independent and Spin-Dependent Couplings of Low-Mass WIMP Dark Matter with a Germanium Detector at a Threshold of 220 EV. Physical Review D, 2009, vol. 79, no. 6, 12.
Cheng J P, Kang K J, Li J M, et al. The China Jinping underground laboratory and its early science. Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 2017, 67: 231-251.
Zhao W, Yue Q, Kang K J, et al. First results on low-mass WIMPs from the CDEX-1 experiment at the China Jinping underground laboratory. Physical Review D, 2013, 88(5): 052004.
Liu W P, Li Z H, He J J, et al. Progress of Jinping underground laboratory for nuclear astrophysics (JUNA). Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, 2016, 59(4): 1-7.
Gibney E, Biever C, Castelvecchi D. Dark-matter probe launches era of Chinese space science: Monkey King is first in a line of Chinese space missions focused on scientific discovery[J]. Nature, 2015, 528(7583): 443-445.
Gibney E, Biever C, Castelvecchi D. Dark-matter probe launches era of Chinese space science: Monkey King is first in a line of Chinese space missions focused on scientific discovery. Nature, 2015, 528(7583): 443-445.
Jin H B, Yue B, Zhang X, et al. Dark matter explanation of the cosmic ray e+ e− spectrum excess and peak feature observed by the DAMPE experiment. Physical Review D, 2018, 98(12): 123008.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







