Proof of Work vs. Proof of Stake in Cryptocurrency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/hset.v39i.6683Keywords:
Proof of Stake; Proof of Work; Cryptocurrency; Ethereum; Bitcoin; Blockchain Algorithm.Abstract
This research document demonstrates the understanding of two key elements: Proof of Work (PoW) and Proof of Stake (PoS) within cryptocurrency. Cryptocurrency is often misunderstood as just volatile and risky but many investors do not understand what it even is. What is proof of work (BTC)? What is proof of stake (ETH)? How are they similar and how are they different? Cryptocurrency is actually more relatable that originally imagined once a person understands digital currency, money, it’s origins, and how they hold similar monetary value within their own wallets. Cryptocurrency in PoW involves complicated mathematical equation solving via mining from a large growing pool of miners. These miners receive rewards such as bitcoin/tokens/etc. from their mined hash blocks verified, and blocks added to the blockchain. Challenges are that there are many miners and there may be a computational limit per core of each PC to be able to mine since Bitcoin has increased its difficulty 70 billion times since it started. BTC or Bitcoin is still widely trusted due to its increasing difficulty to race to the finish line to finish the advanced math computations. Whereas within PoS this is not a race between the masses and advanced math computations, but a validator that generally has more put in their stake vs. gained by receiving the processing fees associated. ETH or Ethereum has shifted from PoW to PoS for its better energy efficiency in resources. It has employed many other additional checks from Casper to Gasper which is the combination of Casper (fork-choice algorithm), LMD-GHOST (heavest observed subtree), and finality which requires 2/3rd agreement as well as once a block is justified it is upgraded to a finalized block. the similarities between the two PoW and PoS are that they are consensus-driven algorithms. They are designed to reach an agreement between the systems in place before each block is placed in the blockchain. Additionally, they also have a shared public ledger that operates on a global if not international scale. With blockchains, there is always only one true version and this is relying on a network rather than a governing authority like a bank/government entity to provide security and to prevent fraudulent transactions. It is still widely contested which is better than these two well-known consensus algorithms and it is still widely contested. The best answer is suited on a per investor per business basis in terms of the willingness of taking a risk just like any investment. This document serves to help provide guidance in the understanding of cryptocurrency of two main consensus algorithms, its similarities, differences, and help identify see what a potential investor the reader may be.
Downloads
References
Ciaian P, Rajcaniova M, Kancs A. The economics of BitCoin price formation[J]. Applied economics, 2016, 48(19): 1799-1815.
Liu Y, Tsyvinski A. Risks and returns of cryptocurrency[J]. The Review of Financial Studies, 2021, 34(6): 2689-2727.
Vranken H. Sustainability of bitcoin and blockchains[J]. Current opinion in environmental sustainability, 2017, 28: 1-9.
Gervais A, Karame G O, Wüst K, et al. On the security and performance of proof of work blockchains[C]//Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security. 2016: 3-16.
Chen R, Tu I P, Chuang K E, et al. Endex: Degree of mining power decentralization for proof-of-work based blockchain systems[J]. IEEE Network, 2020, 34(6): 266-271.
Kiayias A, Miller A, Zindros D. Non-interactive proofs of proof-of-work[C]//International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security. Springer, Cham, 2020: 505-522.
Grassi L, Khovratovich D, Rechberger C, et al. Poseidon: A New Hash Function for {Zero-Knowledge} Proof Systems[C]//30th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 21). 2021: 519-535.
Cheng S, Lin S J. Mining strategies for completing the longest blockchain[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 173935-173943.
Xiao Y, Zhang N, Lou W, et al. A survey of distributed consensus protocols for blockchain networks[J]. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2020, 22(2): 1432-1465.
Jiménez I, Mora-Valencia A, Perote J. Risk quantification and validation for Bitcoin[J]. Operations Research Letters, 2020, 48(4): 534-541.
Zhu X, Xu H, Zhao Z, et al. An Environmental Intrusion Detection Technology Based on WiFi[J]. Wireless Personal Communications, 2021, 119(2): 1425-1436.
Zhang J, Liu Y, Zhang Z. Research on cross-chain technology architecture system based on blockchain [C]// International Conference in Communications, Signal Processing, and Systems. Springer, Singapore, 2019: 2609-2617.
Hu Y, Manzoor A, Ekparinya P, et al. A delay-tolerant payment scheme based on the ethereum blockchain[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 33159-33172.
Kiayias A, Russell A, David B, et al. Ouroboros: A provably secure proof-of-stake blockchain protocol [C] // Annual international cryptology conference. Springer, Cham, 2017: 357-388.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







