Based on the impact of GGDP accounting model on national subsequent development

Authors

  • Zifeng Wang
  • Yu Chen
  • Zhufeng Jiang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/hset.v49i.8558

Keywords:

GGDP model, Optimization of energy use structure, Climate change mitigation, Sustainable development.

Abstract

The ecological environment is closely related to the quality of human life. In recent years, more and more people have realized the importance of protecting the ecological environment. Therefore, the selection of GGDP as the evaluation standard of national development level is more suitable for the sustainable development of human beings. This paper makes an in-depth study on the impact of using GGDP accounting model on the subsequent national development. First of all, we refer to the current three convincing GGDP accounting models, and select the most suitable GGDP model through quantitative indicators, and we have optimized some details on the existing GGDP model. Then, proving that GGDP replaces GDP can slow down the rate of global warming and reduce the frequency of natural disasters. Second, we illustrate the potential benefits of climate mitigation and the negative impact of efforts to change the status quo from multiple aspects, fully demonstrating that the choice of GGDP is worthwhile. Finally, we have analyzed its impact on China in terms of policy, energy use structure, index system and public awareness of environmental protection.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Deng Chunsi. Research on Green GDP Accounting System and Measurement Methods. 2006. Yanshan University, MA Thesis

Chinese National Bureau of Statistics. Research on the impact of social capital on China's green development

Wang Feng, et al. "Population density, energy consumption and green economic development - empirical analysis based on provincial panel data." Resources and environment in arid areas 31.01 (2017): 6-12 doi: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2017.002.

Wang Yongyu, and Guo Liping "Research on Theory and Method of Green GDP Accounting." Statistical Research 27.11 (2010): 77-84 doi: 10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2010.11.013

Stjepanović, Saša, Daniel Tomić, and Marinko Škare. "A new approach to measuring green GDP: a cross-country analysis." Entrepreneurship and sustainability issues 4 (2017): 574-590.

The World Bank, https://www.worldbank.org/en/home

Congregado Emilio, et al."The environmental Kuznets curve and CO2 emissions in the USA: Is the relationship between GDP and CO2 emissions time varying? Evidence across economic sectors." Environmental science and pollution research international 23.18(2016). doi:10.1007/s11356-016-6982-9

Chinese Academy of Environmental Planning. [Technical Guidelines for Green GDP (GGDP/EDP) Accounting]

China Emission Accounts and Datasetshttps://www.ceads.net.cn/

Anqi LI,and Yu ZHAO."Multidimensional Discuss on The Challenge of China's Energy Structure Transition".Proceedings of the 6th Academic Conference of Geology Resource Management and Sustainable Development.Ed.. Aussino Academic Publishing House, 2018, 594-600.

ŠKARE, Marinko, Daniel TOMIĆ, and Saša STJEPANOVIĆ. "Energy Consumption and Green GDP in Europe: A Panel Cointegration Analysis 2008-2016." Acta Montanistica Slovaca 25.1 (2020)

Downloads

Published

21-05-2023