The High-Speed Digital Nomads Trapped in the System: Food Delivery Workers of Meituan

Authors

  • Jiaru Tang
  • Zhengqing Yan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v4i3.1810

Keywords:

Algorithm, China, Digital labour, Food-delivery worker, Platform Economy.

Abstract

This article studies the temporality of platform labor through the specific lens of Meituan, the leading food delivery platform in China featuring an algorithm-driven dispatch system. This paper widens the existing research on platform labor from the perspective of time and speed. The on-demand food delivery service cultivates consumers’ expectations of timely satisfaction, nonetheless, it builds upon the rush, strictness, and flexibility of digital labor’s temporality which is often called a “mission impossible at times”. With the rhetoric of ‘Flexible work hours,’ the platform acts as an intermediary in the contradictory costumer-rider temporal relationship and prioritizes the customer's position within the temporal orders, where ICTs such as real-time tracking systems play a key role in sense-making. As the article will show, Meituan’s ETA (Estimated Time of Arrival) algorithm distributes the common interests of efficiency with the "invisible hand of value," in the quaternary relation between riders, customers, suppliers, and platform. While workers' time experience and negotiating ability are diminished, the platform gains the ultimate capacity to exploit platform labor systematically. The coordination of all platform algorithms normalizes class divisions and unequal power structures, interpreting the asymmetrical power between capital and labor in the platform economy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bauman, Z. (1998). Work, Consumerism and the New Poor. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Cai, R.F. (2021). An Inquiry into Algorithm Materiality On The Perspective of PEC:Take The Meituan “SuperBrain” System for Example. Journalism and Mass Communication Monthly. 2021(11).

Chen, J. Y., & Sun, P. (2020). Temporal arbitrage, fragmented rush, and opportunistic behaviors: The labor politics of time in the platform economy. New Media & Society, 22(9), 1561–1579. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820913567

Couldry, N. & Hepp, A. (2016). The Mediated Construction of Reality. Cambridge and Malden,MA: Polity Press.

Hassan, R. (2020). The condition of digitality: A new perspective on time and space. In: Hassan, Robert. Condition of Digitality: A Post-Modern Marxism for the Practice of Digital Life, The. London: University Of Westminster Press, 2020: [73]-96. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.522617596476446

Heidegger, M. (1959). What Is Metaphysics? Yale University Press.

Lewis, J.D. & Weigert, A.J. (1981). The structures and meanings of social time. Social Forces 60(2): 432–462.

Meituan-Dianping. (2018). Application Proof of Meituan-Dianping. Hong Kong: MeituanDianping.http://www.hkexnews.hk/APP/SEHK/2018/2018062202/Documents/SEHK201806250005.pdf

Meituan. (2022). [Become a Meituan rider]. [Meituan]. https://peisong.meituan.com/app/riderRecruitmentFusion/index?cityCode=100000&channelCode=bd187&recruitType=102&bd_vid=11310105486776099972#/info

Moore, P., & Robinson, A. (2015). The quantified self: what counts in the neoliberal workplace. New Media & Society 18(11): 2774–2792.

Rosa, H., & Trejo-Mathys, J. (2013). Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/rosa14834

Shapiro, A. (2018). Between autonomy and control: strategies of arbitrage in the on-demand economy. New Media & Society 20(8): 29542971.

Snyder, B. H. (2016). The Disrupted Workplace: Time and the Moral Order of Flexible Capitalism,1st Edition. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

Sun, P., Chen, J. Y., & Rani, U. (2021). From Flexible Labour to ‘Sticky Labour’: A Tracking Study of Workers in the Food-Delivery Platform Economy of China. Work, Employment and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170211021570

Shibata, S. (2020). Gig work and the discourse of autonomy: fictitious freedom in Japans digital economy. New Political Economy 25(4): 535551.

Umer, H. (2021). Illusory freedom of physical platform workers: Insights from Uber Eats in Japan. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 32(3), 437–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035304621992466

Urry, J. (1994). Time, Leisure and Social Identity. Time & Society, 3(2), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X94003002001

van Es, K., & Poell, T. (2020). Platform imaginaries and Dutch public service media. Social Media+ Society, 6(2).

Valenduc, G. & Vendramin, P. (2016). Work in the Digital Economy: Sorting the Old from the New, vol. 3. Working Paper No. 2016.03. Brussels: European Trade Union Institute (ETUI). http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/173373

Wajcman, J. (2014). 1. High-Speed Society: Is the Pace of Life Accelerating?. In Pressed for Time: The Acceleration of Life in Digital Capitalism (pp. 13-36). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/9780226196503-004

Wajcman, J. & Dodd, N. (eds) (2016) The Sociology of Speed: Digital, Organizational, and Social Temporalities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wang, S.Y. (2020). [Operational research and optimization of Meituan intelligent dispatch system]. [Meituan], https://tech.meituan.com/2020/02/20/meituan-delivery-operations-research.html

Schiller, D. (1999). Digital capitalism : networking the global market system. MIT Press.

Shu, K.R. (2022). [Mobile media survival: mobile interactive interface in platform labor -- a field survey based on "food delivery"]. Shanghai Journalism Review(2), 13.

Downloads

Published

27 September 2022

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Tang, J., & Yan, Z. (2022). The High-Speed Digital Nomads Trapped in the System: Food Delivery Workers of Meituan. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 4(3), 214-218. https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v4i3.1810