The Fate of the Samurai in the Conflict of the Ages from “Rurouni Kenshin”

Authors

  • Fengkai Liu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v5i3.2457

Keywords:

Rurouni Kenshin, Bushido, Animation, Meji Restoration, Change of Age.

Abstract

This study investigates different samurais' choices and their fates in the anime series "Rurouni Kenshin." In this study, by analyzing different samurai figures in the anime as they go through the changes from the Edo to the Meiji era, the samurai show different ways of reflecting on their own perceptions and traditional bushido: Himura Kenshin reflects on the situation brought to the people by the times and his own samurai identity, and finally chooses to pursue benevolence and not to kill anymore; Saito Hajime keeps the traditional spirit of bushido but blends it with the new era; Shishio Makoto rejects most of the traditional concepts of bushido and is willing to change from being a samurai to being an emperor through his ability and ambition. Most of the previous studies of Bushido focused on the characteristics, the history and trajectory of the formation of Bushido spirit. When studying Bushido in animation, previous studies tended to look for the embodiment of Bushido culture in animation, but fewer focused on the changes of Bushido culture in animation. This study provides a new perspective on examining the impact of changing time using Japanese anime.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Sakara, T. (1984) Samurai’s Thoughts. Perikansha Publishing Inc, Tokyo

Xiang, Q. (2004) The Civilization of Bushido in the Edo Period. Japanese Studies., 5: 120-134.

Li, Z. (2014) The Ending of Bushi Class in Meiji Era. Studies of Modern World History., 0: 152-173+348-349.

Yan, C. (2015) Aesthetic Interpretation of Folklore in the Japanese Film “Rurouni Kenshin”. Popular Literature, 4:186-187.

Downloads

Published

11 November 2022

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Liu, F. (2022). The Fate of the Samurai in the Conflict of the Ages from “Rurouni Kenshin”. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 5(3), 86-88. https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v5i3.2457