Integrating Virtual Reality Tools into Secondary School Classrooms to Address Gender Gap in STEM Education: An Action Plan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/szkzsh33Keywords:
Virtual Reality, STEM Education, Gender GapAbstract
This action plan addresses the gender gap in STEM education by integrating Virtual Reality (VR) tools into secondary school classrooms. Despite various strategies to increase female participation in STEM fields, women remain underrepresented in these areas. The action plan proposes the use of immersive and interactive VR experiences to create more engaging learning environments that may attract a diverse student body, particularly female students. By leveraging the potential of VR to simulate science experiments and other STEM-related activities, this project aims to enhance students' interest and confidence in STEM subjects. A pilot will be conducted in a secondary school, with approximately 50-100 students and a dedicated STEM teaching team. Key strategies include virtual reality technology training for teachers, the design of inclusive STEM curricula, and continuous evaluation through both formative and summative assessments. The expected outcome is that female students will show increased willingness to pursue further study and careers in STEM fields, contributing to long-term reductions in the gender gap in STEM education.
Downloads
References
[1] Bahar, A. K. (2021). Trends in gender disparities among high-achieving students in mathematics: An analysis of the American mathematics competition (AMC). The Gifted Child Quarterly, 65(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016 98622 0960453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220960453
[2] Halpern, D. F. (2007). Science, sex, and good sense: Why women are underrepresented in some areas of science and math. In Why aren’t more women in science: Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 121–130). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11546-010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/11546-010
[3] Dweck, C. S. (2007). Is math a gift? beliefs that put females at risk. In Why aren’t more women in science: Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 47–55). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11546-004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/11546-004
[4] Merayo, N., & Ayuso, A. (2023). Analysis of barriers, supports and gender gap in the choice of STEM studies in secondary education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33(4), 1471–1498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09776-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09776-9
[5] Makransky, G., Petersen, G. B., & Klingenberg, S. (2020). Can an immersive virtual reality simulation increase students’ interest and career aspirations in science? British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 2079–2097. https://doi.org/10. 1111/bjet.12954. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12954
[6] Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi. org/10.2307/30036540 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
[7] Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record (1970), 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810610800610
[8] Zobel, G. (2013). Streamlined ID: A practical guide to instructional design [Review of Streamlined ID: A Practical Guide to Instructional Design]. Technical Communication, 60(4), 331–331. Society for Technical Communication.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Education and Humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
