Descriptive Analysis of Sexism Expressions in English Proverbs

Authors

  • Lizhen Liang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/kpdrzk96

Keywords:

English Proverbs, Gender Discrimination, Stereotypes

Abstract

Gender discrimination has existed in language for a long time, especially in proverbs, which often harbor underlying biases, reinforcing and perpetuating stereotypes and unequal power dynamics. By adopting a descriptive method, this article aims to study existing English proverbs containing sexism, summarize the characteristics of words containing sexism. It intends to improve people’s understanding of sexism and generate new insight on sexism in English proverbs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Lakoff, R. (1975). Linguistic theory and the real world 1. Language Learning, 25(2), 309-338.

[2] Lan, T., & Jingxia, L. (2019). On gender discrimination in english. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 10(3), 155-159.

[3] Mohsen, O. A., & Ahmed, M. B. (2023). Gender Bias Ideologies in Proverbial Discourse. Journal of Tikrit University for The Humanities, 30.

[4] Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2021). The social psychology of gender: How power and intimacy shape gender relations. Guilford Publications.

[5] Speake, J. (Ed.). (2015). Oxford dictionary of proverbs. OUP Oxford.

[6] Talbot, M. M. (2003). Gender stereotypes: reproduction and challenge. In J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (Eds.), The handbook of language and gender (pp. 468–486). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing

[7] Yksel, W. (1993). Women in proverbs. Oxford university

[8] Yue-ling, Z. (2022). Analysis of Sexism in English and Chinese Proverbs. Journal of Literature and Art Studies, 12(2), 188-194.

[9] Zheng, X. (2018). The analysis of sexism in English proverbs. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(2), 352-357.

Downloads

Published

25 November 2024

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Liang, L. (2024). Descriptive Analysis of Sexism Expressions in English Proverbs. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 17(2), 35-37. https://doi.org/10.54097/kpdrzk96