Challenges Confronted in Online Teaching for Oil Painting Conservation and Restoration Course
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v2i2.281Keywords:
Online Teaching, Oil Painting Conservation and Restoration, Equipment, Platform, Software, Interaction.Abstract
The study aimed to explore the challenges confronted in online teaching for oil painting conservation and restoration course. A qualitative method of data collection was employed and the semi-structured interviews were conducted. 21 samples were chosen from professionals as professors, deans and IT specialists. The data collected through semi-structured interview were recorded and transcribed verbatim by qualitative analysis software ATLAS. ti 9. The research findings reflected that ① the challenges encountered in online teaching Oil Painting Conservation and Restoration courses were mainly demonstrated in six aspects: the environment, the equipment, the software, the Internet, the students’ aspect, and the teachers’ aspect ; ② the two most acute and salient factors account for these challenges were “LESS INTERACTION” and “LESS PRACTICAL PRACTICE”. The study illustrated these challenges profoundly and put forward suggestions for trouble-shooting to better take advantage of the online teaching device and module.
Downloads
References
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. (4th ed.). Boston, USA: Pearson.
Denzil, C. (2013). Connectivism: Probing Prospects for a Technology-Centered Pedagogical Transition in Religious Studies 1. Alternation, 10(Special Edition), 172–199. http://www.finance.ukzn.ac.za/docs/20.7/09 Che.pdf
Kvale, S. (2007). Doing interviews. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lapitan, L. D., Tiangco, C. E., Sumalinog, D. A. G., Sabarillo, N. S., & Diaz, J. M. (2021). An effective blended online teaching and learning strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education for Chemical Engineers, 35(May 2020), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2021.01.012
Merriam, S.B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass.
Ocak, M. A. (2011). Why are faculty members not teaching blended courses? Insights from faculty members. Computers & Education, 56(3), 689–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2010.10.011
Patton, M. O. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Siemens, G. (2006). Connectivism. Learning theory or pastime for the self-amused? Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism_self-amused.htm
Sun, Hongyan. (2019). An Analysis of the Training Model and Scheme of Professional Talents in Oil Painting Protection and Restoration. Administration and Management. Vol. 19. pp.114-115.
Wu, Q. (2019). Brief description of the significance and functions of building a shared oil painting restoration scientific research platform in colleges and universities. Science and Technology Innovation and Application, 2019(18), 45-46+50
Yang, C., Huan, S., & Yang, Y. (2020). Application of big data technology in blended teaching of college students: A case study on rain classroom. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(11), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.3991/IJET.V15I11.14519
Yuan, Yue. (2019). A Macroscopic Examination of Prices and Investment Returns in the Chinese Art Market. Massey University.