The Passive Voice in Abstracts in Research Articles: A Diachronic Variation across Disciplines

Fan Zhang; Rongping Cao

doi:10.54097/49q16a46

Authors

Fan Zhang
Rongping Cao

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/49q16a46

Keywords:

Abstract, Corpus-based, Disciplinary Variation, Passive Voice

Abstract

The passive voice has been commonly used in academic writing for decades. This research aims to investigate the diachronic changes in the use of passive voice in abstracts across four disciplines in natural sciences and social sciences over the past fifteen years. The study corpus comprises 180 abstracts in four disciplines, ranging from 2008-2012, 2013-2017, and 2018-2022. Both tag tools and statistical tools were utilized to reveal the changes in the use of passive voice. The results indicated a slight decline in the use of passive voice in the 180 abstracts over the years, with an increase in natural sciences and a decline in social sciences. Additionally, in the past five years, there has been a discernible difference between the use of passive voice in natural sciences and social sciences, with natural science abstracts containing more passive voice. This research offers insights into changes in passive voice use in abstract writing and contributes to English for Academic Purposes (EAP) instruction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] C. Coffin, M. Curry, S. Goodman, A. Hewings, T. Lillis, and J. Swann, Teaching academic writing: A toolkit for higher education, London: Rouledge, 2003.

[2] C.L. Barber, “Some measurable characteristics of modern scientific prose,” in Contributions to English syntax and philology, ed. F. Behre, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1962, pp. 21–43.

[3] D. Biber, Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge University Press, 1988.

[4] Y. Cao and R. Xiao. Cao, “A multi-dimensional contrastive study of English abstracts by native and nonnative writers,” Corpora, vol. 8, no, 2, pp. 209-234, 2013.

[5] D. Banks, “The extent to which the passive voice is used in the scientific journal article, 1985-2015,” Functional Linguistics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 12, 2017.

[6] G. Leech, M. Hundt, C. Mair, and N. Smith, Change in contemporary English: A grammatical study, Cambridge University Press, 2009.

[7] K. Hyland, and F. Jiang, “ Is academic writing becoming more informal?” English for Specific Purposes, vol. 45, pp. 40–51, 2017.

[8] A. Leong, “ The passive voice in scientific writing through the ages: A diachronic study,” Text & Talk, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 467–489. 2020.

[9] M. Hundt, G. Schneider, and E. Seoane, “The use of the be-passive in academic Englishes: Local versus global usage in an international language”, Corpora, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 29–61, 2016.

[10] Z. Li, “Is academic writing less passivized? Corpus-based evidence from research article abstracts in applied linguistics over the past three decades (1990–2019)”, Scientometrics, vol. 127, no. 10, pp. 5773–5792, 2022.

[11] A. G. Gross, J. E. Harmon, and M. Reidy, Communicating science: The scientific article from the seventeenth century to the present. Oxford University Press, 2002.

[12] L. Wang, and N. Wang, “Colloquialisation in EFL learners‘ theses in China,” Modern Foreign Languages, no. 2, pp. 275-286, 2017.

[13] Y. M. Ju, “A comparative study of rhetorical persuation of English research article abstracts by Chinese and English writers,” Foreign Languages Bimonthly, no. 01, pp. 85-92, 2020.

[14] M. Nasseri, and P. Thompson, “ Lexical density and diversity in dissertation abstracts: Revisiting English L1 vs. L2 text differences,” Assessing Writing, vol. 41, pp. 100511, 2021.

[15] J. Bitchener, Writing an applied linguistics thesis or dissertation: A guide to presenting empirical research, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2010.

[16] X. Hu and Y. Huang, “A contrastive study on the use of common high-frequency lexical bundles in different moves of English abstracts in Chinese and English engineering journals,” Foreign Language Learning Theory and Practice, no. 04, pp. 31-36, 2017.

[17] D. Yoneoka, and E. Ota, “Evaluating association between linguistic characteristics of abstracts and risk of bias: Case of Japanese randomized controlled trials,” PLOSONE, vol. 12, no. 3, Article e0173526, 2017.

[18] K. Hyland, and P. Tse, “Hooking the reader: A corpus study of evaluative that in abstracts,” English for Specific Purposes, vol. 24, pp. 123–139, 2005.

[19] Y. H. Liu and Y. Zhang, “A contrastive study of the abstracts in international journal articles by Chinese and English-speaking scholars”, Foreign Language World, no. 05, pp. 20-27, 2016.

[20] Q. Xie and Y. Y. Ma, “A multi-dimensional contrastive analysis of English abstracts in dissertations by Chinese and Native Ph.D. students,” Foreign Language Research, no. 04, pp. 39-44, 2021.

[21] F. Jiang, “EAP research over the past 40 years: Topics and development,” Foreign Language Teaching and Research, no. 03, pp. 413-424, 2022.