Assessing Professional Development and Teaching Effectiveness

Authors

  • Jinwen Xiao
  • DR.ROSALIE D. MERIALES

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/qvz42h48

Keywords:

Professional Development, Teaching Effectiveness, Teacher Training, Leadership Development, Assessment Literacy, Classroom Management

Abstract

This study examines the correlation between professional development programs and teaching efficacy among primary school educators in China. The research investigates sustained learning, emotional support, assessment literacy, leadership development, and educational reform support as essential elements of professional development. Furthermore, it assesses topic knowledge, pedagogical abilities, classroom management, student progress assessment, and reflective practice as measures of teaching efficacy. A descriptive comparative-correlational study methodology was utilized, employing a stratified sample approach to choose participants from five elementary schools. Data were gathered using a validated survey questionnaire and analyzed employing descriptive statistics, the Mann-Whitney U test, the Kruskal-Wallis test, and Spearman’s rho correlation coefficient. Results demonstrate that educators evaluated their professional development programs as somewhat effective in all areas, with sustained learning achieving the highest rating and emotional support the lowest. Their teaching performance was assessed as average, with reflective practice receiving the greatest score, while instructional skills and student progress monitoring received the lowest scores. Statistical analysis revealed no significant disparities in the evaluation of professional development and teaching effectiveness when categorized by sex, age, or educational attainment. A notable disparity was observed in student progress monitoring relative to years of teaching experience. A robust positive association was identified between professional development and teaching effectiveness, suggesting that increased professional development programs result in improved teaching performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2022). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. Teachers College Press.

[2] Chen, X., & Wang, Z. (2020). Bridging the gap: Enhancing assessment literacy in

[3] Chinese elementary schools. Journal of Educational Assessment, 14(3), 203-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243353.2020.1056829

[4] Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2021). Effective teacher

[5] professional development: A comprehensive review of research. Harvard Education Press.

[6] Desimone, L. M., & Garet, M. S. (2019). Best practices in teacher professional development: A framework for improvement. American Educational Research Journal, 56(4), 790-821. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219859619

[7] Guskey, T. R. (2022). Evaluating professional development: Evidence-based

[8] approaches for improving teaching and learning. Harvard Education Press.

[9] Avalos, B. (2021). Teacher professional development in the global education

[10] landscape: Challenges and best practices. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, 101623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101623

[11] Zhang, L., & Liu, M. (2021). A review of professional development policies and practices in China's elementary education. Journal of Teacher Education and Research, 16(2), 211-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/09759912.2021

Downloads

Published

14 April 2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Xiao, J., & DR.ROSALIE D. MERIALES. (2025). Assessing Professional Development and Teaching Effectiveness. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 19(1), 168-173. https://doi.org/10.54097/qvz42h48