Media Representation and Social Identity: A Study of Public Discourse Construction and the Empowerment of Marginalised Groups in the Digital Age
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/jq9t4b14Keywords:
Digital Empowerment, Media Representation, Social Identity, Marginalized Groups, Public Discourse, Platform GovernanceAbstract
With the rapid development of digital media technology, the relationship between media representation and social identity has taken on new complexities in contemporary society. This study focuses on how marginalised groups in the digital age construct self-identity and strive for a voice through media participation practices. In the specific socio-cultural context of contemporary China, traditional power structures and discourse systems are undergoing profound changes brought about by digital technology. However, existing research is mostly limited to media empowerment theory in Western contexts, lacking a systematic exploration of the mechanisms of digital media empowerment in the specific cultural context of non-Western societies. This study aims to fill this theoretical gap. It uses a combination of multiple theoretical perspectives, such as critical discourse analysis, media representation theory, affective public theory and platform research, as well as mixed research methods such as digital ethnography, social network analysis and in-depth interviews, to explore in depth how the algorithmic governance of digital media platforms affects the media visibility of marginal groups, how marginal groups use strategic media practices to construct counter-hegemonic discourses, how the networked public sphere changes the process of collective identity formation, and how digital labour and cultural production in the context of platform capitalism reshapes the social identity of marginalised groups. The research will create a theoretically grounded framework with local adaptability, develop a mixed research method of computational-ethnography, propose a digital media literacy intervention model, construct an inclusive digital governance framework, and provide theoretical support and practical guidance for the construction of a more just digital media ecosystem.
Downloads
References
[1] Akhtar, N. (2014). Social network analysis tools. In 2014 Fourth International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies (pp. 388-392). IEEE.
[2] Baker, P., & Levon, E. (2015). Picking the right cherries? A comparison of corpus-based and qualitative analyses of news articles about masculinity. Discourse & Communication, 9(2), 221-236.
[3] Beer, D. (2019). The social power of algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 1-13.
[4] Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739-768.
[5] Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2024). Analyzing social networks (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
[6] Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Harvard University Press.
[7] Brock, A. (2018). Critical technocultural discourse analysis. New Media & Society, 20(3), 1012-1030.
[8] Bucher, T. (2012). Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook. New media & society, 14(7), 1164-1180.
[9] Castells, M. (2015). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
[10] Couldry, N. (2010). Why voice matters: Culture and politics after neoliberalism. SAGE Publications.
[11] Couldry, N. (2012). Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice. Polity Press.
[12] Creemers, R. (2019). Cyber China: Upgrading propaganda, public opinion work and social management for the twenty-first century. Chinese Authoritarianism in the Information Age, 15-30.
[13] Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
[14] Dahlgren, P. (2009). Media and political engagement: Citizens, communication, and democracy. Cambridge University Press.
[15] Dubois, E., & Blank, G. (2018). The echo chamber is overstated: The moderating effect of political interest and diverse media. Information, Communication & Society, 21(5), 729-745.
[16] Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge.
[17] Fraser, N. (2000). Rethinking recognition. New Left Review, 3, 107-120.
[18] Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of 'platforms'. New Media & Society, 12(3), 347-364.
[19] Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, & K. A. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society (pp. 167-194). MIT Press.
[20] Ginsburg, F. (2008). Rethinking the digital age. In P. Wilson & M. Stewart (Eds.), Global indigenous media: Cultures, poetics, and politics (pp. 287-306). Duke University Press.
[21] González-Bailón, S., & Wang, N. (2016). Networked discontent: The anatomy of protest campaigns in social media. Social Networks, 44, 95-104.
[22] Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. SAGE Publications.
[23] Hine, C. (2015). Ethnography for the internet: Embedded, embodied and everyday. Bloomsbury Academic.
[24] Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York University Press.
[25] Jenkins, H., Ford, S., & Green, J. (2013). Spreadable media: Creating value and meaning in a networked culture. New York University Press.
[26] Kozinets, R. V. (2015). Netnography: Redefined (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
[27] Light, B., Burgess, J., & Duguay, S. (2018). The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps. New Media & Society, 20(3), 881-900.
[28] Lingel, J. (2017). Digital countercultures and the struggle for community. MIT Press.
[29] Liu, B. (2022). Sentiment analysis: Mining opinions, sentiments, and emotions. Nota.
[30] Marwick, A. E. (2013). Status update: Celebrity, publicity, and branding in the social media age. Yale University Press.
[31] Miller, T. (2007). Cultural citizenship: Cosmopolitanism, consumerism, and television in a neoliberal age. Temple University Press.
[32] Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press.
[33] Orgad, S. (2014). Media representation and the global imagination. Polity Press.
[34] Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press.
[35] Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (2016). Digital ethnography: Principles and practice. SAGE Publications.
[36] Postill, J., & Pink, S. (2012). Social media ethnography: The digital researcher in a messy web. Media International Australia, 145(1), 123-134.
[37] Qiu, J. L. (2017). Goodbye iSlave: A manifesto for digital abolition. University of Illinois Press.
[38] Rogers, R. (2019). Doing digital methods. SAGE Publications.
[39] Schneider, F. (2018). China's digital nationalism. Oxford University Press.
[40] Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. Polity Press.
[41] Taylor, C. (1994). The politics of recognition. In A. Gutmann (Ed.), Multiculturalism: Examining the politics of recognition (pp. 25-73). Princeton University Press.
[42] Tremayne, M. (2014). Anatomy of protest in the digital era: A network analysis of Twitter and Occupy Wall Street. Social Movement Studies, 13(1), 110-126.
[43] Trottier, D. (2016). Social media as surveillance: Rethinking visibility in a converging world. Ashgate.
[44] van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2020). The digital divide. Polity Press.
[45] van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press.
[46] Waisbord, S. (2015). Three challenges for communication and global social change. Communication Theory, 25(2), 144-165.
[47] Wallis, C. (2011). New media practices in China: Youth patterns, processes, and politics. International Journal of Communication, 5, 406-436.
[48] Wang, W. Y., & Lobato, R. (2019). Chinese video streaming services in the context of global platform studies. Chinese Journal of Communication, 12(3), 356-371.
[49] Yang, G. (2009). The power of the Internet in China: Citizen activism online. Columbia University Press.
[50] Zhang, L., & Barr, M. (2013). Green politics in China: Environmental governance and state-society relations. Pluto Press.
[51] Zhao, Y. (2008). Communication in China: Political economy, power, and conflict. Rowman & Littlefield.
[52] Zuboff, S. (2023). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Profile Books.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Education and Humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
