Beyond the Benefits: Ethical Considerations for AI in L2 Doctoral Writing and the Role of Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/x8q26w95Keywords:
AI Ethics, Ethical Concerns, L2 Doctoral Wiring, Higher EducationAbstract
This paper examines the multifaceted ethical challenges arising from the integration of generative AI in academic writing, with a specific focus on the second language (L2) PhD students. While AI tools offer benefits like personalized feedback and content generation, they also raise concerns about privacy risks (stemming from data collection and potential misuse), plagiarism issues (particularly unintentional plagiarism among L2 writers), and algorithmic bias (potentially impairing critical thinking and perpetuating societal inequities). The study emphasizes the need for a holistic approach to cultivating AI ethical awareness within higher education, encompassing students, faculty, and institutions. This includes the development of practical strategies for L2 writers-navigating linguistic and cultural nuances, preserving original voice, preventing unintentional plagiarism through diligent verification, and fostering critical AI literacy. Ultimately, the paper advocates for the establishment of clear ethical guidelines, proactive institutional policies promoting responsible AI integration, and supportive learning environments. These measures are crucial for upholding academic integrity, fostering ethical scholarship, and ensuring the quality and originality of L2 doctoral students’ research in the age of AI.
Downloads
References
[1] Jarrah, A. M., Wardat, Y., & Fidalgo, P. (2023). Using ChatGPT in academic writing is (not) a form of plagiarism: What does the literature say. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 13(4), e202346.
[2] Lund, B. D., Wang, T., Mannuru, N. R., Nie, B., Shimray, S., & Wang, Z. (2023). ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 74(5), 570-581.
[3] Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart learning environments, 10(1), 15.
[4] Gilbert, C., & Gilbert, M. A. (2024). The convergence of artificial intelligence and privacy: navigating innovation with ethical considerations. International Journal, 3(9).
[5] Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students' cognitive abilities: a systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 28.
[6] Nguyen, A., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Huang, X. (2024). Human-AI collaboration patterns in AI-assisted academic writing. Studies in Higher Education, 49(5), 847-864.
[7] Salazar, L. R., Peeples, S. F., & Brooks, M. E. (2024). Generative AI ethical considerations and discriminatory biases on diverse students within the classroom. In The role of generative AI in the communication classroom (pp. 191-213). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
[8] Hutson, J. (2024). Rethinking plagiarism in the era of generative AI. Journal of Intelligent Communication, 3(2), 20-31.
[9] Selvam, M., & Vallejo, R. G. (2025). Ethical and Privacy Considerations in AI-Driven Language Learning. LatIA, (3), 328.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Education and Humanities

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.







