Elementary School Students’ Intimate Relationships: A Rational Choice Theory Perspective

Authors

  • Zhuo Zhu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/jjgktf74

Keywords:

Rational Choice Theory, Intimate Relationships, Elementary School Students, Social Interaction, Emotional Needs

Abstract

Guided by Coleman’s Rational Choice Theory, this study investigates the motives and decision‐making mechanisms underlying elementary school students’ formation of intimate peer relationships. Rational Choice Theory posits that individuals decide among alternative actions by evaluating expected costs and benefits. Within this framework, children’s choices about close relationships reflect not only the pursuit of emotional gratification but also considerations of interactional costs, anticipated social returns, and prevailing social norms. As elementary students are in a pivotal stage of psychological and social development, intimate ties function both as sources of emotional support and as platforms for social recognition and the cultivation of future interpersonal competencies. Understanding how children make friendship choices through rational deliberation is therefore crucial for promoting their socialization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Paternoster R., Jaynes C.M., Wilson T. Rational Choice Theory and Interest in the “Fortune of Others”. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 2017, Vol. 54 (No. 6), p. 847-868.

[2] Ooghe E., Schokkaert E. School accountability: can we reward schools and avoid pupil selection? Social Choice and Welfare, 2016, Vol. 46 (No. 2), p. 359-387.

[3] Bouffard J.A., Exum M.L. Rational choice beyond the classroom: decision making in offenders versus college students. Journal of Criminal Justice, 2013, Vol. 41 (No. 6), p. 438-447.

[4] van der Wel P., van Steenbergen H. Pupil dilation as an index of effort in cognitive control tasks: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2018, Vol. 25, p. 2005-2015.

[5] Wentzel K.R., Jablansky S., Scalise N.R. Do Friendships Afford Academic Benefits? A Meta-Analytic Study. Educational Psychology Review, 2018, Vol. 30 (No. 4), p. 1241-1267.

[6] Wang C.-A., Munoz D.P. A circuit for pupil orienting responses: implications for cognitive modulation of pupil size. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 2015, Vol. 33, p. 134-140.

[7] Hallinan M.T. Structural effects on children’s friendships and cliques. Social Psychology Quarterly, 1979, Vol. 42 (No. 1), p. 43-54.

[8] Koster M., Nakken H., Pijl S.J., van Houten E. Being part of the peer group: a literature study focusing on the social dimension of inclusion in education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 2009, Vol. 13 (No. 2), p. 117-140.

[9] Saddler H. Researching the influence of teaching assistants on the learning of pupils with special educational needs in mainstream primary schools: exploring social inclusion. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 2014, Vol. 14 (No. 3), p. 145-152.

[10] Williams E.I., Gleeson K., Jones B.E. How pupils on the autism spectrum make sense of themselves in mainstream school settings: a qualitative metasynthesis. Autism, 2019, Vol. 23 (No. 1), p. 8-28.

Downloads

Published

10 September 2025

Issue

Section

Articles