The Unique Generation Mechanism of Chinese Cultural Subjectivity from the Perspective of Civilization Comparison

Authors

  • Xinran Zhao

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/22w2jz23

Keywords:

Cultural Subjectivity, Civilization Morphology, Symbiotic Modernity, Two Combinations, Civilization Iteration

Abstract

In the context of globalization, civilization comparison has become an important methodology for studying cultural subjectivity. This article constructs a framework for analyzing the morphology of civilization, revealing the unique generation mechanism of Chinese cultural subjectivity in the evolution of civilization. The study points out that Chinese path to modernization has broken through the "Western centric" narrative, and achieved the symbiosis of traditional foundation maintenance and modern transformation through the triple logic of civilization continuity, theoretical innovation and symbiotic modernity. This mechanism not only provides cultural and philosophical support for understanding Chinese path to modernization, but also provides a "generative co construction" Chinese program for global civilization mutual learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Sun, Jiaming, and Xun Wang. "Value differences between generations in China: A study in Shanghai." Journal of Youth Studies 13.1 (2010): 65-81.

[2] Hall, David L., and Roger T. Ames. Thinking from the Han: Self, truth, and transcendence in Chinese and Western culture. State University of New York Press, 1997.

[3] Balazs, Etienne. Chinese civilization and bureaucracy: Variations on a theme. Vol. 200. Yale University Press, 1967.

[4] Wei-Ming, Tu. "Cultural China: The periphery as the center." Daedalus (1991): 1-32.

[5] Faure, Guy Olivier, and Tony Fang. "Changing Chinese values: Keeping up with paradoxes." International business review 17.2 (2008): 194-207.

[6] Feuerwerker, Yi-tsi Mei. Ideology, power, text: Self-representation and the peasant ‘Other’in Modern Chinese literature. Stanford university press, 1998.

[7] Skocpol, Theda, and Margaret Somers. "The uses of comparative history in macrosocial inquiry." Comparative studies in society and history 22.2 (1980): 174-197.

[8] Matsumoto, David, and Seung Hee Yoo. "Toward a new generation of cross-cultural research." Perspectives on psychological science 1.3 (2006): 234-250.

[9] Hämäläinen, Juha. "In between Marxism and tradition: citizenship education in China in view of the intellectual heritage of Chinese civilization." Cogent Education 11.1 (2024): 2416811.

[10] Shen, Yuting, Yanzhen Zhu, and Rui Yang. "Integrating traditional knowledge of non-Western humanities and social sciences: a research agenda through the Chinese lens." Studies in Higher Education 50.9 (2025): 1951-1965.

Downloads

Published

19 January 2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Zhao, X. (2026). The Unique Generation Mechanism of Chinese Cultural Subjectivity from the Perspective of Civilization Comparison. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 22(1), 25-28. https://doi.org/10.54097/22w2jz23