Data Literacy and Value Judgment: Research on the Dual Core Structure of Ideological Ability of Counselors in the Era of AI

Authors

  • Hua Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/n5gjg620

Keywords:

Data Literacy, Value Judgment, AI Era, Counselor, Ideological Competence

Abstract

In the context of artificial intelligence technology being deeply integrated into higher education, university counselors face new challenges and opportunities in ideological work. This study constructs a dual-core model of "data technology literacy" and "value judgment ability," exploring their interactive mechanisms within counselors' ideological competency framework and their influence pathways on students' ideological identification. Through questionnaire surveys, paired data from 412 counselors and 2,168 corresponding students across 35 universities nationwide were collected, with structural equation modeling used to validate the theoretical model. The findings reveal: data technology literacy significantly positively impacts value judgment ability (β=0.427, p<0.001), jointly explaining 58.7% of variations in students' ideological identification; value judgment ability fully mediates the relationship between data technology literacy and students' ideological identification; counselors' data technology literacy influences students' ideological identification through a three-stage pathway of "tool empowerment-cognitive deepening-value guidance." Multigroup analysis indicates that professional background and work experience mediate the influence pathways of dual-core competencies. Based on these findings, this study establishes a three-tiered cultivation system of "technological adaptation-integrated application-innovation leadership" and proposes a development pathway for counselors' ideological capabilities encompassing "technological empowerment-ethical embedding-subject construction," providing a theoretical framework and practical solutions for the professional development of ideological work in the AI era.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Chen Zhiyong, Li Xia. The Realistic Situation and Practical Transcendence of Disruptive Technology Empowering Ideological and Political Education [J]. Journal of Ideological and Political Education Research, 2022, (09): 142-147.

[2] Feng Gang. Actively Constructing the Ideological work System in the New Era [J]. Research on Ideological and Political. 2025, (05):8-10.

[3] Liu Jianjun. The Requirements of the Times for the Study of Principles of Ideological and Political Education [J]. Teaching and Research, 2025, (02): 41-48.

[4] Shen Zhuanghai. A Comprehensive Discussion on the Relationship between Teachers' Ideological and Political Education and Teachers' Morality and Style [J]. Educational Research, 2022, 43(10): 50-56.

[5] Mandinach, E. B., & Gummer, E. S. (2013). A systemic view of implementing data literacy in educator preparation. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 30–37.

[6] Knight, S., & Shum, S. B. (2017). Theory and learning analytics. In Handbook of learning analytics(pp. 17-22). Society for Learning Analytics Research.

[7] Crawford, K. (2021). The Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence. Yale University Press.

[8] Leonardi, P. M. (2011). When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 147–167.

[9] Trist, E. (1981). The evolution of socio-technical systems. Occasional paper, 2, 2-67.

[10] Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, S. M. (1993). Competence at work: Models for superior performance. John Wiley & Sons

Downloads

Published

19 January 2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Zhang, H. (2026). Data Literacy and Value Judgment: Research on the Dual Core Structure of Ideological Ability of Counselors in the Era of AI. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 22(1), 29-38. https://doi.org/10.54097/n5gjg620