Analysis of Aesthetic Features and Formal Reconfiguration of Audiovisual Language in the Algorithmic Era
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/9kbthp23Keywords:
Algorithmic Aesthetics, Formal Reconfiguration, Average Shot Length (ASL), Attention EconomyAbstract
As algorithmic logic becomes deeply embedded in the production and distribution of audiovisual content, audiovisual language is undergoing a paradigmatic shift from "art-driven" to "data-driven" models. Through a quantitative analysis of authoritative databases such as Cinemetrics, this study finds that audiovisual language in the algorithmic era exhibits significant fragmentation and high-frequency stimulation: the Average Shot Length (ASL) has plummeted from the traditional 4.0 seconds to a mere 1.5–2.1 seconds. In terms of aesthetic features, algorithms construct a converged "machine aesthetics" by filtering for high-saturation and high-contrast visual parameters, shifting audiovisual presentation from "director-centric" to a "click-through rate (CTR)-oriented" personalized reconfiguration. At the formal level, influenced by the "Golden 3 Seconds" rule, the narrative focus has been drastically shifted forward, reconfiguring linear narratives into inverted pyramid structures designed for attention capture. This study argues that while such reconfiguration enhances communication efficiency, it also brings challenges such as aesthetic homogenization and perceptual superficiality. This paper aims to explore the underlying logical reconstruction of audiovisual language by algorithms, providing theoretical support for cinematic art creation in the age of intelligent communication.
Downloads
References
[1] Tsivian, Y. (2025). Cinemetrics and the quantitative history of film style. Journal of Film Studies, 34(2), 112–128.
[2] Cutting, J. E., Brunick, K. L., DeLong, J. E., Iricinschi, C., & Candan, A. (2010). Quicker, faster, darker: Changes in Hollywood film over 75 years. i-Perception, 1(2), 106–116.
[3] Shao, P. (2023). Algorithmic culture and the reshaping of visual power: From human curation to machine vision. New Media & Society, 25(4), 812–830.
[4] Murray, N., Marchesotti, L., & Perronnin, F. (2012). AVA: A large-scale database for aesthetic visual analysis. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 116(10), 2408–2415.
[5] Manovich, L. (2018). AI Aesthetics. Strelka Press.
[6] Deloitte Insights. (2025). Digital media trends: The algorithmic transformation of global video consumption. Strategic Media Review, 18(1), 42–59.
[7] Netflix Technology Group. (2017). Artwork personalization and visual aesthetics in algorithmic distribution. Journal of Computing in Media, 12(4), 215–233.
[8] Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130–1132.
[9] Hallinan, B., & Striphas, T. (2016). Recommended for you: The Netflix Prize and the production of algorithmic culture. New Media & Society, 18(1), 117–137.
[10] Covington, P., Adams, J., & Sargin, E. (2016). Deep Neural Networks for YouTube Recommendations. Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys '16), 191–198.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Education and Humanities

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.







