Competitive Variety Show Scoring based on Constrained Bayesian Optimization and Shapley value Decomposition

Authors

  • Yue Liang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/se19sm12

Keywords:

Constrained Bayesian Optimization, Dispute Composite Index, Shapley Value, Structural Equation Model, Feature Attribution

Abstract

In response to the core question of how to fairly integrate judges' professional ratings and audience voting in Dancing with the Stars (DWTS), this paper proposes a three-stage algorithm framework. In the first stage, a constrained Bayesian optimization model is constructed, mapping the weekly judge scores to Dirichlet priors, and using the elimination results as inequality constraints, the distribution of undisclosed audience votes is inversely estimated by sequential least squares programming (SLSQP). The model achieved a 87.2% agreement rate for elimination prediction over 185 weeks, and the estimated uncertainty decreased from 14.8% in the early stage to 6.2% in the final. In the second stage, the generalized weighted composite score (GWCS) framework and the Controversial Composite Index (CCI) are established, and the system compares the ranking method and the percentage method. Regression analysis (R²=0.996) showed that rank differences contributed 90% of the controversial variance, and 88.1% of the weeks had a balanced effective weight. In the third stage, structural equation model (SEM) and Shapley value decomposition were used to quantify the causal effects of celebrity characteristics and professional dancer quality on the score. The results showed that the number of weeks dominated the change in score (62.0% contribution), there was a significant negative bias in age (β=-0.318), and the partner quality contribution was 11.9%. This framework provides explainable algorithmic support for the scoring design of competitive variety shows.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Tian, Y., Zhang, L., Wang, J. Boundary exploration for Bayesian optimization with unknown physical constraints. ICML, 2024.

[2] El Bouchattaoui, M., Benbrahim, H., Daoudi, M. Causal contrastive learning for counterfactual regression over time. NeurIPS, 2024.

[3] Muschalk, M., Fichte, J., Grosse, K. shapiq: Shapley interactions for machine learning. NeurIPS, 2024.

[4] Lin, X., Zhen, H., Li, Z., Zhang, Q., Kwong, S. Pareto set learning for expensive multi objective optimization. NeurIPS, 2022.

[5] Sensoy, M., Kaplan, L., Kandemir, M. Evidential deep learning to quantify classification uncertainty. NeurIPS, 2018.

[6] Lundberg, S.M., Lee, S.I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. NeurIPS, 2017.

[7] Li, M., Zhang, H., Chen, L. Shapley value: from cooperative game to explainable artificial intelligence. Autonomous Intelligent Systems, 4(1):2, 2024.

[8] Chen, H., Lundberg, S.M., Lee, S.I. Explaining a series of models by propagating Shapley values. Nature Communications, 13(1):4512, 2022.

[9] Daulton, S., Eriksson, D., Balandat, M., Bakshy, E. Multi objective Bayesian optimization over high dimensional search spaces. UAI, 2022.

[10] Lin, X., Zhen, H., Li, Z., Zhang, Q., Kwong, S. Pareto multi task learning. NeurIPS, 2019.

[11] Sukthanker, R.S., Zela, A., Hutter, F. Multi objective differentiable neural architecture search. ICMLW, 2024.

[12] Abdolmaleki, A., Huang, S., Hasenclever, L., Heess, N., Riedmiller, M. A distributional view on multi objective policy optimization. ICML, 2020.

[13] Balandat, M., Karrer, B., Jiang, D.R., Daulton, S., Letham, B., Wilson, A.G., Bakshy, E. BoTorch: A framework for efficient Monte Carlo Bayesian optimization. NeurIPS, 2020.

[14] Aas, K., Jullum, M., Løland, A. Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to Shapley values. Artificial Intelligence, 298:103502, 2021.

[15] Pearl, J. The seven tools of causal inference, with reflections on machine learning. Communications of the ACM, 62(3):54-60, 2019.

Downloads

Published

20 April 2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Liang, Y. (2026). Competitive Variety Show Scoring based on Constrained Bayesian Optimization and Shapley value Decomposition. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 23(1), 49-53. https://doi.org/10.54097/se19sm12