Empirical Study on Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition Strategies and Efficiency among Non-English Major Undergraduates
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/gq19xj97Keywords:
Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition, Vocabulary Acquisition Strategies, Vocabulary Acquisition Efficiency, Non-English Major Undergraduates, Language Proficiency, Moderating EffectAbstract
Based on Nation’s Vocabulary Knowledge Framework and Schmitt’s Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition Strategy Theory, this study takes 320 non-English major undergraduates from 3 universities in Shanghai as research subjects. Adopting a combination of questionnaire survey, quantitative data analysis, and follow-up experiment, it systematically explores the impact mechanisms of four vocabulary acquisition strategies (root and affix strategy, contextual guessing strategy, rote memorization strategy, associative memory strategy) on second language vocabulary acquisition efficiency, and examines the moderating effect of language proficiency (divided by CET-4 scores into high, intermediate, and low proficiency groups). The results show that: contextual guessing strategy is significantly positively correlated with vocabulary acquisition efficiency (r=0.42, p<0.01), and this effect is not moderated by language proficiency; the positive effect of root and affix strategy is only significant among high-proficiency learners (r=0.35, p<0.05); low-proficiency learners’ dependence on rote memorization strategy (M=3.89) is significantly higher than that of high-proficiency learners (M=3.21, t=3.17, p<0.01); associative memory strategy is significantly positively correlated with efficiency (r=0.30, p<0.01), while rote memorization strategy is significantly negatively correlated with efficiency (r=-0.28, p<0.05). Based on these findings, this study constructs a localized teaching model of "hierarchical strategy guidance + contextualized training", providing empirical evidence for the optimization of college second language vocabulary teaching.
Downloads
References
[1] Cieślicka A B. Literal salience in on-line processing of idiomatic expressions by second language learners[J]. Second Language Research, Vol. 22 (2006) No.2, p.115-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658306sr263oa
[2] Folse K S. Vocabulary Myths: Applying Second Language Research to Classroom Teaching (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor 2004). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.23925
[3] Jiang N. Lexical representation and development in a second language[J]. Applied Linguistics, Vol. 21 (2000) No.1, p.47-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.1.47
[4] Nation I S P. Learning Vocabulary in Another Language (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2001). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524759
[5] Nation I S P. Teaching and learning vocabulary[J]. Language Teaching, Vol. 38 (2005) No.1, p.129-136.
[6] Oxford R L. Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know (Heinle & Heinle, Boston 1990).
[7] Schmitt N. Vocabulary learning strategies[J]. Language Learning, Vol. 47 (1997) No.2, p.207-246.
[8] Schmitt N. Vocabulary in Language Teaching (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2000).
[9] Schmitt N, McCarthy M. Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1997).
[10] Pu J Z. Collocations, chunks and vocabulary teaching in English[J]. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 35 (2003) No.6, p.438-445.
[11] Wang C M. Three complexes in foreign language teaching and effective paths of language acquisition[J]. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 43 (2011) No.4, p.540-549.
[12] Zhang P. A developmental study of Chinese English learners’ vocabulary association and collocational knowledge[J]. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 48 (2016) No.2, p.259-272.
[13] Zhang S J. A study on the associative patterns of Chinese English learners’ mental lexicon[J]. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 37 (2005) No.1, p.36-42.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Education and Humanities

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.







