GenAI Empowering Vocational Education Ecosystems: A Digital Innovation Ecosystem Theory Perspective

Authors

  • Xuanyi Chen Faculty of Education, Tianjin University of Technology and Education, Tianjin 300222, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/pkcm8y27

Keywords:

Vocational Education, Generative Artificial Intelligence, Education Ecology, Digital Innovation Ecosystem Theory

Abstract

The rapid development of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is propelling vocational education from instrumental digitalization toward ecological reconstruction. Existing research has largely focused on GenAI's value in teaching assistance, resource generation, and learning support, but has insufficiently addressed how it reshapes multi-actor relationships, organizational structures, and governance logic within vocational education. This paper introduces the Digital Innovation Ecosystem (DIE) theory and analyzes the intrinsic mechanisms through which GenAI empowers the ecological reconstruction of vocational education across five dimensions: innovation actors, innovation structure, innovation institutions, innovation functions, and innovation evolution. The study argues that GenAI, as an intelligent agentic element with connecting, translating, and coordinating functions, drives teachers, students, enterprises, industry organizations, and platform institutions to form a new type of human-machine co-creation collaborative relationship. By interconnecting data infrastructure, linking intelligent platforms, and coordinating task networks, GenAI propels vocational education's structure from resource aggregation to process coupling. Relying on data governance, algorithmic ethics, and human-machine coordination institutions, it ensures safe and orderly technology application, and releases educational value through practical knowledge translation, higher-order competency generation, and industry-education demand matching. At the same time, GenAI's empowerment of vocational education still faces real impediments: insufficient actor collaboration, loose structural connections, lagging institutional supply, constrained functional release, and weak evolutionary mechanisms. Accordingly, this paper proposes five practical pathways: layered activation of actor participation to resolve the coordination deficit; a 'small but precise' strategy to advance data infrastructure construction; establishing a 'graded and scenario-based' institutional governance framework; reconstructing an embodied experience-oriented task resource system through 'human-machine collaborative practical training'; and building a progressive evolutionary mechanism of 'small-step piloting - process reengineering - reciprocal co-creation'.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Yang, Z. K., Wang, J., Wu, D., et al. (2023). Analysis of ChatGPT/generative AI's impact on education and response strategies. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 41(7), 26–35.

[2] Xu, G. Q., Cai, J. F., Jiang, B. J., et al. (2023). ChatGPT/generative AI and the future of vocational education. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 41(7), 64–77.

[3] Wang, Y. X., & Hao, T. C. (2025). Generative AI empowering vocational education reform: Challenges and practical pathways. Education and Vocation, (4), 14–20.

[4] Zhang, C., Chen, K. H., & Mu, R. P. (2021). Digital innovation ecosystem: Theoretical construction and future research. Science Research Management, 42(3), 1–11.

[5] Ma, L. P., Zheng, X. R., & Zhou, X. H. (2026). Typological profiles of students using generative AI for learning assistance - An empirical study based on a survey of undergraduates in 20 national universities. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 44(1), 65–79.

[6] Hou, H. X., & Wang, D. (2025). Risks and avoidance pathways for instructional innovation risks of teachers in the era of generative artificial intelligence. China Educational Technology, (3), 20–26.

[7] Bao, W., Sun, X. Z., & Wu, J. Q. (2025). Deconstructing the constraining factors for enterprise deep participation in industry-education integrated talent cultivation - A mixed-methods study based on AI large language models. China Higher Education Research, (7), 8–16.

[8] Zhang, X. J., Song, Y., & Chen, S. Z. (2025). Analysis of the current situation and challenge review of AIGC-empowered vocational education. Research and Exploration in Laboratory, 44(11), 154–158, 190.

[9] Ministry of Education, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, & National Data Bureau. (2026, April 2). Notice on issuing the "Action Plan for Artificial Intelligence + Education". http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A16/s3342/202604/t20260410_1433240.html

[10] Shi, W. P., & Lin, J. Q. (2025). Basic logic, real challenges, and reform strategies for data governance in higher vocational colleges. Modern Education Management, (5), 81–90.

[11] Chang, J. F. (2026). Logic, risks, and responses of artificial intelligence embedding in social governance - An analysis based on literature review. Journal of Northwest Minzu University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), (2), 76–83.

[12] Shi, W. P., & Lin, J. Q. (2025). Basic logic, real challenges, and reform strategies for data governance in higher vocational colleges. Modern Education Management, (5), 81–90.

[13] Li, X. T. (2026). Education assessment paradoxes in the intelligent era: AIGC application crisis and assessment paradigm reconstruction. Distance Education in China, 46(3), 141–158.

[14] He, R. L., & Shen, B. (2026). Logical construction and realization pathways for generative AI empowering government governance capacity transformation. Reform, (1), 128–139.

[15] Yang, W. T., & Li, C. W. (2026). Ethical risks and response measures for generative AI application in the education sector. Journal of Zhongzhou, (2), 111–118.

[16] Zheng, H. J. (2025). Research on ethical risks and trustworthy governance pathways of generative artificial intelligence. Science and Technology Progress and Policy, 42(12), 38–48.

[17] Wang, Y. M., Zhang, T. T., & Mao, C. C. (2025). Application scenarios, risk challenges, and countermeasures for generative artificial intelligence in global vocational education. China Vocational and Technical Education, (6), 27–33.

[18] Yuan, P. L., & Song, X. (2025). The hollow idol: A critical reflection on generative AI's educational applications. Tsinghua Journal of Education, 46(4), 19–27.

[19] Wang, F. C., Tang, X. Y., & Yu, S. Q. (2025). Cognitive outsourcing based on generative artificial intelligence: Interactive behavior patterns and cognitive structure characteristics analysis. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 57(6), 967–986.

[20] School of Education, Tsinghua University, & Education Management Information Center of the Ministry of Education. (2026, January 20). Development report on artificial intelligence applications in vocational education (2024–2025). http://47.92.87.222:2021/evaluate/infoSingleArticle.do?articleId=1384886&columnId=666133

[21] Wang, D. (2022). Research on teachers' intelligent educational literacy under the vision of artificial intelligence: Connotation, challenges, and cultivation strategies. Journal of Chinese Education, (3), 91–96.

Downloads

Published

12 July 2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Chen, X. (2026). GenAI Empowering Vocational Education Ecosystems: A Digital Innovation Ecosystem Theory Perspective. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 24(1), 65-75. https://doi.org/10.54097/pkcm8y27