How Translation Shapes Modern Chinese? Corpus-Based Evidence and Theoretical Explanations from the Perspective of Language Contact
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/b1k6bx27Keywords:
Language Contact, Translation, Modern Chinese, Corpus-Based Translation Studies, Shining-Through, NormalizationAbstract
Translation has long been recognized as a major site of language contact, yet the mechanisms through which translated texts influence the development of modern Chinese remain underexplored. Drawing on a synthesis of corpus-based translation studies over the past three decades, this paper examines how translation has shaped modern Chinese from the perspective of language contact. Evidence from parallel and comparable corpora reveals that translation-induced changes are observable at multiple linguistic levels: lexical (increased frequency and expanded functions of prepositions, adoption of new vocabulary), syntactic (longer attributive structures, more explicit clause connectors, rising dependency distances), and registeral (convergence between translated and original academic prose on some dimensions but divergence on others). Theoretically, the “shining-through” effect of source languages, the normalization tendency of translators, and the gradual replication of frequency patterns from translated to original texts explain the transmission of these features. However, the shaping effect operates within the constraints of the target language system: translation activates and enriches existing grammatical resources rather than fundamentally altering Chinese linguistic typology. The paper concludes that translation functions as a conservative yet cumulative agent of change, accelerating ongoing trends while respecting the structural boundaries and cultural preferences of modern Chinese.
Downloads
References
[1] Afzaal, M., et al. (2022). Myth or reality? Some directions on translation universals in recent corpus-based case studies. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 90–100.
[2] Baker, M. (1993). Corpus linguistics and translation studies: Implications and applications. Corpus Linguistics and Translation Studies, 234–249.
[3] Dai, G. R. (2021). A corpus-based study on the use of aspect markers in translated Chinese texts. Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education, (4), 76–82.
[4] Li, D., Zhang, C., & Liu, K. (2011). Translation style and ideology: A corpus-assisted analysis of two English translations of Hongloumeng. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 26(2), 153–166.
[5] Hu, M., & Zhu, Y. (2023). From translation universals to a multi-dimensional model of translation features. Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education, (5), 13–18.
[6] Hu, X., & Li, J. (2025). A metrical study of normalization features in human and machine translations across registers. Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education, (2), 37–46.
[7] Huang, L., & Wang, K. (2023). Developmental stages and frontier trends in corpus-based translation studies. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, (5), 764–776.
[8] Jiang, Y., Fan, L., & Wang, Y. (2021). Syntactic features of translated language based on dependency treebanks. Foreign Language Education, (3), 41–46.
[9] Aijmer, K., & Altenberg, B. (Eds.). (1991). English corpus linguistics. Longman.
[10] Kruger, H. (2018). That again: A multivariate analysis of the factors conditioning syntactic explicitness in translated English. Across Languages and Cultures, 1585–1923.
[11] Laviosa, S. (1998). Core patterns of lexical use in a comparable corpus of English narrative prose. Meta, (4), 557–570.
[12] Liu, D., & Zhang, Z. (2022). Syntactic analysis and corpus development and application: Retrospect and prospect. Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education, (6), 82–88.
[13] Flowerdew, L. (2009). Applying corpus linguistics to pedagogy: A critical evaluation. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, (3), 393–417.
[14] Pang, S., & Wang, K. (2019). On the trends in corpus-based translation studies from the perspective of expanding the third code. Foreign Language Education, (1), 95–99.
[15] Pang, S. (2024). A dynamic investigation of translation universals: A multi-genre analysis based on diachronic corpora. Foreign Languages and Literature, (5), 132–144.
[16] Laviosa, S. (2004). Corpus-based translation studies: Where does it come from? Where is it going? Language Matters: Studies in the Languages of Africa, (1), 6–27.
[17] Volansky, V., Ordan, N., & Wintner, S. (2015). On the features of translationese. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, (1), 98–118.
[18] Wang, G., & Xin, Y. (2024). An analytical framework for corpus-based translation studies. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, (4), 1–12.
[19] Xu, J., & Sun, M. (2025). Innovations in corpus-based translation research methods driven by large language models. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, (3), 456–468.
[20] Xu, W. (2026). A comparative study of English and Chinese prepositions and their translation from the perspective of language contact: A sampling analysis based on the 'English-Chinese Literary Classics Corpus'. Journal of Foreign Languages, (2), 62–73.
[21] Zhang, Z., & Pang, S. (2026). A diachronic comparative study of stylistic features between translated Chinese academic texts and original Chinese academic texts. Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education, (2), 28–36.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Education and Humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
