The Influence of Critical Period Hypothesis on Children’s Foreign Language Learning

Authors

  • Wen He

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/47436s45

Keywords:

Critical Period Hypothesis, Age Factor, Foreign Language Learning

Abstract

In the context of globalization, China has been putting more and more emphasis on "telling the story of China in English", and the status of English teaching has become more and more important. The critical period hypothesis is a theory put forward by Ellis, a foreign linguist, who believes that there is a golden period for language learning. During this period, children are able to master language naturally and effortlessly. An important aspect of second language acquisition research is the age factor. In general, children are more likely to succeed in learning a foreign language than adults, and children have a child advantage in second language acquisition. However, academics have different views on the age factor, and Chinese parents are also hesitant to decide when their children should learn English, resulting in a trend towards learning at a younger age. Is there really a critical period in foreign language learning? Is there really a critical period in learning a foreign language and is it closely related to age? Do children really have an absolute advantage over teenagers and adults in learning foreign languages? Therefore, this thesis will firstly introduce the proponents and opponents about the critical period hypothesis, and secondly explain the influence of age factor on foreign language learning. Thirdly, talk about why the age factor affects second language acquisition. argue for the optimal age for foreign language teaching. Fourth, discusses the implications of children's foreign language learning. Finally, it is a brief conclusion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Johnson, J.S., E.L. Newport.: Critical Period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language, Cognitive Psychology, Vol.1 (1989) No.21, p.60-69.

Larsen Freeman D and Long M: An Introduction to Second Language Acquisition Research (Essex: Longman Group 1991).

Lenneberg E H: Biological foundation of language (New York: Wiley 1967).

Newport E L: Contrasting conception of the critical period for language (Carey S. Gelman R. The epigenesis of mind. Hill-sdale. NJ: Lawrence Er; baum Associates 1991).

Norm Chomsky: Language and Mind (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich 1968).

Penfield W., Roberts L.: Speech and Brain-mechanisms (Princeton: Princeton University Press 1959).

Silverber g, S, A.G. Sammuel: The effect of age of second language acquisition on the representation and processing of second language words, Journal of Memory and language, Vol.3(2004) No.51, p.381-391.

Dai Manchun: Age Differences in Second Language Acquisition, Foreign Language Field (1994)No. 2.

Dai Yuncai: Individual Learner Differences and Second Language Acquisition, Journal of Ningbo University (Education Science Edition)(2005)No.05, p.30-34+50.

Jie Jinling, Ma Jianhua: An overview of the Critical period hypothesis and its implications for foreign language Learning, Heilongjiang Science, Vol. 3 (2014) No.08, p.95.

Lu Xiaoyong, "The Critical Period Hypothesis" and "One-Train" English Teaching in Language Acquisition, Foreign Language Circle (2004)No.01, p.62-68.

Meng Xiaofang, The Critical Period Hypothesis of Second Language Acquisition, Modern English (2022)No.08, p.107-110.

Shi Nijun, Li Yanyang: Age factors in second language Acquisition, Neijiang Science and Technology, Vol.28(2017) No. 10, p.109+46.

Yang Lianrui: Critical Period and Optimal Age for second language Acquisition, Journal of Foreign Languages (2004) No.05, p.101-106+112.

Downloads

Published

17-03-2024

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

He, W. (2024). The Influence of Critical Period Hypothesis on Children’s Foreign Language Learning. Journal of Education and Educational Research, 7(3), 159-162. https://doi.org/10.54097/47436s45