Exploring Big Ideas-based Holistic Unit Teaching Design from the Perspective of Ausubel’s Subsumption Theory

Authors

  • Na Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/5ke0zx98

Keywords:

BIHUTD, Meaningful Learning, Mechanism and Practice Strategies of BIHUTD, Subsumption Theory, Systematic Forgetting

Abstract

Big Ideas-based and Thematic Meaning-focused Holistic Unit Teaching Design (BIHUTD) is playing a significant role in cultivating students’ English core competences. In a Big Ideas-based Holistic Unit Teaching process, the inquiry of thematic meaning of a unit is literally the construction of big ideas. This thematic meaning is then closely connected with other sub-themes of each text by leading those subordinate discourses. The prominent role of this concept of association is in concordance with the relatability between new knowledge and cognitive structure in Ausubel’s Subsumption Theory. From the perspective of Meaningful Learning and Systematic Forgetting (Ausubel, 1968), more profound insights can be obtained regarding the underlying mechanism and practice strategies of BIHUTD. Through BIHUTD, meaningful learning can be achieved by building substantive association between thematic meaning and sub-themes of texts; long-term memory can be achieved by providing various meaningful texts and contexts related to both sub-themes and big theme; cognitive pruning can be achieved by incorporating specific and fragmented items and sub-themes in each text into the generalized thematic meaning of a whole unit. In BIHUTD, teachers can manufacture meaningfulness by setting objectives, organizing content and arranging activities based on the big theme, promote optimal pruning procedures by supplementing and integrating textbook discourses with different perspectives to construct thematic meaning, and facilitate communicative competence by providing production activities to deepen thematic meaning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ausubel, D. Educational psychology: A cognitive view[M]. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston,1968.

H. Douglas Brown. Principles of language learning and teaching[M]. (5th ed.). White Plains, NY: Pearson Education, 2007.

Whiteley, M. Big ideas: A close look at the Australian history curriculum from a primary teacher's perspective [J]. Agora, 2012,47(1): 41-45.

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. Understanding by Design[M]. (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development,2005.

Cao Hongjuan. Theme-based Integration of High School English Multi-textbook Texts Teaching Practice[J]. Foreign Language Teaching in Schools,2022,45(07):9-14.

Cheng Xiaotang, The Concept and Practice of English Teaching Based on Thematic Meaning Inquiry [J]. Foreign Language Teaching in Schools, 2018(10): 1-7.

Cui Yunhuo. How to Carry out Large-unit Design Pointing to the Subject Core Literacy [J]. Beijing Education (General Education Edition),2019(02):11-15.

Dun Jian, He Caixia. Big Concept-centered Unit Teaching Design[J]. Basic Education Curriculum,2019(18):6-11.

Hu Run, Chen Xinzhong. Strategies of Integrated Unit Teaching Design of English in Senior High[J]. Foreign Language Teaching in Schools,2020,43(09):6-10.

The Ministry of Education. New English Curriculum for Chinese Senior Middle Schools [M]. Beijing: People's Education Press, 2018.

Li Yuhang. Integrated Unit Teaching Design of Junior High Based on Thematic Meaning Inquiry [J]. English Teaching and Research in Primary and Secondary Schools, 2022 (06):38-41.

Wang Qiang, Sun Weiwei et al. Integrated Unit Teaching Design of English in Senior High Pointing to Deep Learning[J]. Frontiers of Foreign Language Education Research,2021, 4(01): 17-25+87-88.

Wang Qiang, Zhou Mi et al. Big Ideas-based Integrated Unit Teaching Design of English in Senior High[J]. Foreign Language Teaching in Schools,2021,44(01):1-7.

Downloads

Published

10-07-2024

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Wang, N. (2024). Exploring Big Ideas-based Holistic Unit Teaching Design from the Perspective of Ausubel’s Subsumption Theory. Journal of Education and Educational Research, 9(2), 306-309. https://doi.org/10.54097/5ke0zx98

Similar Articles

1-10 of 770

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.