Optimizing Student Management Strategies and Student Engement in Vocational Technical Colleges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/wdsn4g70Keywords:
Admissions Procedure, Student Assistance Programs, Attendance Tracking TechnologyAbstract
This research aimed to assess the efficacy of student management practices and their influence on academic engagement among vocational-technical students in China. The study evaluated crucial aspects such as the admissions procedure, student assistance programs, attendance tracking, and technology to pinpoint obstacles and potential areas for improvement. Data was gathered using quantitative approach to assess their perspectives on management practices and academic involvement. The results indicated that using technology had a beneficial effect on student involvement. However, there were notable areas for improvement, such as student support services, attendance tracking, and the admissions process. The student support services were deemed unsatisfactory, with restricted availability and inadequate influence on academic achievements. The attendance tracking system was operational, but it did not impact student participation. On the other hand, the admissions procedure was equitable, but it lacked individualized assistance for students. Furthermore, the research revealed that students had modest intrinsic motivation, self-regulated learning, and goal-setting. Nevertheless, the level of academic aid provided needed to be improved, and the potential for collaborative learning was not fully realized due to participation difficulties. The study revealed that the mental health care provided was insufficient, and the inflexible academic schedule hindered students’ capacity to engage in interdisciplinary studies or modify their course loads based on individual circumstances. In addition, students expressed a lack of participation in decision-making procedures, which led to feelings of disconnection.
Downloads
References
[1] Anderson, M., Thomas, L., & Ferguson, J. (2021). Collaborative learning and student engagement: Exploring the relationship and its impact on academic success. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 13(1), 49-61.
[2] Babbie, E. R. (2016). The practice of social research. Cengage Learning.
[3] Bail, F. T., Zhang, Y., & Fredrickson, R. (2020). The impact of study habits on academic performance: Insights from large-scale educational research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(3), 487-504.
[4] Bandura, A. (2018). Social Cognitive Theory of Self-Regulation. New York: Springer.
[5] Barkley, E. F., Major, C. H., & Cross, K. P. (2020). Collaborative Learning Techniques: A Handbook for College Faculty. Wiley.
[6] Bettinger, E. P., Long, B. T., & Oreopoulos, P. (2020). Increasing college completion rates with a student support services model. Education Next, 20(1), 58-64.
[7] Brown, A., & Lee, B. (2020). Admissions Criteria in Higher Education Institutions. Journal of Higher Education, 25(3), 123-136.
[8] Chen, Y., & Liu, X. (2019). Strategies for Enhancing Admissions Processes. Journal of Higher Education Administration, 35(2), 78-91.
[9] Cheng, S., & Wong, T. (2019). Effective Practices in Academic Advising. Journal of College Student Development, 30(4), 187-200.
[10] Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2019). E-learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. Wiley.
[11] Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
[12] Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2019). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior (4th ed.). New York: Springer.
[13] Dillenbourg, P. (2013). The Evolution of Research on Collaborative Learning. In E. M. Andergassen & A. Stein (Eds.), Innovations in Education (pp. 189-210). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
[14] Duckworth, A. L. (2016). Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance. New York: Scribner.
[15] Fain, P. (2020). Transparency and Fairness in College Admissions. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https:// www. insidehighered.com/news/2020/03/31/states-focus-fairness-transparency-college-admissions.
[16] Fredricks, J. A., et al. (2020). Measuring Student Engagement in Upper Elementary through High School: A Description of 21 Instruments. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[17] Gadbow, N., et al. (2020). Student management strategies and school discipline: Best practices for vocational education. New York, NY: Routledge.
[18] Garcia, C., & Martinez, D. (2018). Fostering Diversity in Admissions: Best Practices. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 12(2), 89-102.
[19] Hulleman, C. S., & Barron, K. E. (2016). Goal setting in education: Fostering student motivation through setting and achieving goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(8), 1057-1070.
[20] Hu, M., & Kim, J. (2019). Impact of Technology Integration on Student Learning. Journal of Educational Technology, 32(1), 34-47.
[21] Johnson, E., et al. (2018). Effective Communication in Class Scheduling. Educational Leadership, 40(2), 89-102.
[22] Lei, S., Wang, Y., & Luo, H. (2022). The role of technology in enhancing student engagement: A meta-analytic review. Educational Technology & Society, 25(3), 45-57.
[23] Li, H., & Kim, J. (2019). Efficiency in Admissions Processing. Journal of College Admission, 30(4), 180-194.
[24] Liu, H., et al. (2017). Faculty Support for Technology Integration. Journal of Educational Technology, 15(4), 105-118.
[25] Nguyen, T., & Tran, H. (2021). Comprehensive Student Support Services in Vocational Schools. Journal of Student Affairs, 18(1), 45-58.
[26] Olson, J. (2019). Improving Access and Equity in Higher Education Admissions. Journal of College Admissions, 245(2), 28-36.
[27] Pajares, F. (2014). Motivation and Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents. In K. R. Wentzel & D. B. Miele (Eds.), Handbook of Motivation at School (2nd ed., pp. 313-331). New York: Routledge.
[28] Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 422.
[29] Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (2015). Motivational and Self-Regulated Learning Components of Classroom Academic Performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.
[30] Schunk, D. H., & Greene, J. A. (2018). Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance. Routledge.
[31] Sundar, S., & Kaur, H. (2021). Early Warning Systems in Higher Education: Using Attendance Data to Identify At-Risk Students. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(3), 211-224.
[32] Tan, K., & Lim, S. (2020). Flexible Class Scheduling Practices in Vocational Schools. Journal of Vocational Education, 28(2), 67-82.
[33] Taylor, R., et al. (2019). Enhancing Student Support Services for Underrepresented Groups. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 25(4), 187-200.
[34] Wang, X., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Student Feedback in Improving Class Scheduling Practices. Journal of Academic Advising, 12(2), 105-118.
[35] Wang, Y., & Gao, X. (2021). Current Situation and Countermeasures of Student Management in Vocational Schools. Modern Vocational Education, 9(22), 87-90.
[36] Wu, Y., & Zhang, L. (2017). Student Support Services and Student Satisfaction. Journal of Higher Education, 35(4), 207-220.
[37] Yang, S., & Wu, L. (2020). Student Perspectives on Technology Integration. Journal of Educational Administration, 18(2), 78-91.
[38] Zimmerman, B. J. (2013). From Cognitive Modeling to Self-Regulation: A Social Cognitive Career Path. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 135-147.
[39] Zimmerman, B. J., & Moylan, A. R. (2018). Self-regulated learning: Where we are and where we need to go. Educational Psychology Review, 30(1), 17-24.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Education and Educational Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
