Human-Centered AI in Educational Leadership: Implications for Students’ Academic Empowerment in a Music College in Inner Mongolia

Authors

  • Suzhen Li

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/a4eywq15

Keywords:

Digital Transformation of Education, Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence, Academic Autonomy, Educational Leadership, Technology Ethics, Student Development, Digital Literacy, Empowerment Mechanisms

Abstract

The rapid digital transformation of education has brought artificial intelligence (AI) from a peripheral technological tool to a central force reshaping teaching, learning, and educational leadership. Within this context, human-centered artificial intelligence (HCAI) has emerged as a critical paradigm emphasizing ethics, transparency, inclusivity, and the enhancement of human agency rather than technological determinism. This paper explores how human-centered AI practices in educational leadership influence students’ academic empowerment in a music college in Inner Mongolia. Drawing on theories of educational leadership, learner autonomy, digital literacy, and empowerment mechanisms, the study develops a conceptual and analytical framework to explain how leadership decisions regarding AI adoption affect students’ academic autonomy, motivation, creative development, and ethical awareness. Using a qualitative-dominant mixed analytical approach, the paper examines leadership strategies, institutional culture, and student experiences in the context of music education, where creativity, embodiment, and cultural heritage play essential roles. Two analytical Tables are used to illustrate (1) the leadership-driven mechanisms of human-centered AI implementation and (2) the pathways through which AI-supported learning environments contribute to students’ academic empowerment. The findings suggest that when AI is guided by human-centered principles and ethical leadership, it can enhance personalized learning, strengthen academic autonomy, and support holistic student development. Conversely, technocentric or efficiency-driven AI adoption risks undermining creativity and learner agency. The paper concludes with implications for educational leadership, policy, and future research in arts-based higher education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Bush, T. (2020). *Educational leadership and management*. Sage.

[2] Floridi, L., et al. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society. *Minds and Machines*, 28(4), 689–707.

[3] Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). *Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education*. Pearson.

[4] McPherson, G. E., & Welch, G. F. (2018). *Music education and the role of technology*. Oxford University Press.

[5] Selwyn, N. (2019). *Should robots replace teachers?*. Polity Press.

[6] Shneiderman, B. (2020). Human-centered artificial intelligence: Reliable, safe & trustworthy. *International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction*, 36(6), 495–504.

[7] Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner. *Theory Into Practice*, 41(2), 64–70.

Downloads

Published

31-12-2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Li, S. (2025). Human-Centered AI in Educational Leadership: Implications for Students’ Academic Empowerment in a Music College in Inner Mongolia. Journal of Education and Educational Research, 16(2), 85-91. https://doi.org/10.54097/a4eywq15