Exploration of a Psychological Crisis Prevention and Intervention Mechanism in Universities: An Integrated Approach Based on the "Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality" (CAMS) Framework

Authors

  • Wei Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/skn89723

Keywords:

Psychological Crisis Intervention, Suicide Prevention, Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality (CAMS)

Abstract

The prevention and intervention of psychological crises among university students constitute a core challenge for mental health education in higher education institutions. Traditional intervention models often suffer from limitations such as delayed identification, passive intervention, and fragmented management. To systematically enhance intervention efficacy, this study introduces the empirically supported "Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality" (CAMS) framework from clinical psychology, aiming to systematically construct an integrated psychological crisis prevention and intervention mechanism applicable to the higher education context. This mechanism is student-centered, emphasizes collaboration, and covers the entire intervention process. This paper first analyzes the core concepts of the CAMS framework (e.g., collaborative therapeutic alliance, focus on "suicide drivers") and its inherent compatibility with the university psychological work system. Subsequently, it systematically elaborates, from a theoretical perspective, the four core components of implementing this mechanism in higher education settings: preventive screening, dynamic assessment, collaborative intervention, and long-term management. The core of this mechanism lies in establishing a solid collaborative alliance with students in crisis to jointly define and manage their fundamental "suicide drivers," thereby promoting a paradigm shift from passive crisis response to proactive risk management. This provides a theoretical framework and implementation pathway with clear operability for establishing a scientific and efficient psychological crisis work system in higher education institutions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Wu C, Jiang G, Duan W. Research on the current situation and countermeasures of suicide among college students in China [J]. Heilongjiang Researches on Higher Education, 2018, 36(05): 95-99.

[2] Tan Q, Luan Y, Xu C, et al. Meta-analysis of detection rate of suicidal ideation among Chinese college students [J]. Modern Preventive Medicine, 2022, 49(07): 1269-1274.

[3] Wei L, Zhu X, Zhao D, et al. "Preparatory suicide attempt" versus "suicidal intent": Testing the full path of the interpersonal theory of suicide [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2023, 31(04): 797-802.

[4] Liu J, Wang M, Sun Q, et al. Investigation on the management status of psychological counseling and crisis intervention for college students in China [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2022, 30(02): 477-482.

[5] Yang L, Wang L, Hou X. Definition of suicide and its core concepts [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2022, 30(05): 1213-1217.

[6] Coppersmith DDL, Ryan O, Fortgang RG, Millner AJ, Kleiman EM, Nock MK. Mapping the timescale of suicidal thinking [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2023, 120(17): e2215434120.

[7] Wu C, Zhou Z, Yu L, et al. Does asking about suicide "induce" suicide risk? Iatrogenic effects of suicide screening and risk assessment [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2023, 31(05): 1140-1144+1149.

[8] Huang A, Liu J, Zhang W, et al. Ethical issues in university crisis intervention work from the client's perspective: A qualitative analysis [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2022, 30(02): 483-487.

[9] Xie S, Hu X, Shao H, et al. Dilemmas and optimization strategies of school psychological crisis intervention from multiple perspectives [J]. Chinese Journal of School Health, 2023, 44(09): 1377-1381.

[10] Pisani AR, Murrie DC, Silverman MM. Reformulating Suicide Risk Formulation: From Prediction to Prevention [J]. Academic Psychiatry, 2016, 40(4): 623-629.

[11] Coppersmith DDL, Jaroszewski AC, Gershman SJ, et al. Do people know how suicidal they will be? Understanding suicidal prospection [J]. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 2024, 54(4): 750-761.

[12] Xiao S. Several issues in suicide behavior research [J]. Chinese Journal of Disease Control & Prevention, 2019, 23(11): 1334-1337.

[13] Jobes DA. The Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality (CAMS): an evolving evidence-based clinical approach to suicidal risk [J]. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 2012, 42(6): 640-653.

[14] Pistorello J, Jobes DA, Gallop R, et al. A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality (CAMS) Versus Treatment as Usual (TAU) for Suicidal College Students [J]. Archives of Suicide Research, 2021, 25(4): 765-789.

[15] Zhou Y, Fan H, Wang X. Case intervention for suicidal ideation in college students: Based on CAMS and the three-stage theory of suicide [C]// Chinese Psychological Society. Abstracts of the 24th National Academic Conference of Psychology. 2022: 146-148.

[16] Peng F, Han L. Research progress on protective factors in psychological crisis (review) [J]. China Journal of Health Psychology, 2023, 31(03): 326-330.

Downloads

Published

25-01-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Wang, W. (2026). Exploration of a Psychological Crisis Prevention and Intervention Mechanism in Universities: An Integrated Approach Based on the "Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality" (CAMS) Framework. Journal of Education and Educational Research, 17(1), 24-27. https://doi.org/10.54097/skn89723