The Theoretical Construction and Practical Path of AIGC Technology Empowering Environmental Design Paradigm Transformation

Authors

  • Lei Li

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/ke5qkw28

Keywords:

AIGC, Environmental Design, Paradigm Transformation, Theoretical Construction, Practical Path

Abstract

With the rapid development of generative artificial intelligence technology, AIGC is gradually evolving from an auxiliary application at the level of a single tool to an important force that affects the production of environmental design knowledge, program generation, expression dissemination and implementation coordination. For environmental design, the significance of AIGC is not only to improve the speed of drawing or enrich the visual expression, but also to reorganise the information flow, decision-making chain and collaboration in design activities, promote the traditional experience accumulation, linear advancement and result-oriented work mode, and support data, intelligent participation and The new paradigm shift of Cheng Lianlian. Based on the practice of environmental design discipline, this article analyses the basic logic of AIGC to promote the transformation of environmental design paradigms, discusses its theoretical construction in terms of methodology, cognitive structure and design organisation, further summarises its main performance from the three aspects of creative generation, process reorganisation and narrative expression, and from the design concept, work The four dimensions of mechanism, talent training and applied ecology put forward a practical path. AIGC will not replace the main value of environmental design, but will shift design from "single technique competition" to "comprehensive judgement ability competition", providing new method support and transformation opportunities for the high-quality development of environmental design.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Adger, W. N. (2000). Social and ecological resilience: Are they related? Progress in Human Geography, 24(3), 347–364.

[2] Agamben, G. (1999). The man without content. Stanford University Press.

[3] Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. Greenwood Press.

[4] Drucker, P. F. (1994). The frontiers of management. Routledge.

[5] Howkins, J. (2001). The creative economy: How people make money from ideas. Penguin.

[6] Jung, C. G. (1968). Archetypes and the collective unconscious (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.

[7] Kwon, M. (2004). One place after another: Site-specific art and locational identity. MIT Press.

[8] Norberg-Schulz, C. (1979). Genius loci: Towards a phenomenology of architecture.

[9] Wang, Y. Q. (2020). Symbolic economics practice of urban and rural integration development. Gansu Social Sciences, (4), 196–203.

[10] Xiang, Y. (2021). Value logic, action framework and path selection of rural cultural. Journal of Beijing Dance Academy, (4), 83–88.

Downloads

Published

29-04-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Li, L. (2026). The Theoretical Construction and Practical Path of AIGC Technology Empowering Environmental Design Paradigm Transformation. Journal of Education and Educational Research, 18(3), 52-58. https://doi.org/10.54097/ke5qkw28