Practical Logic, Practical Dilemmas and Optimization Strategies of Artificial Intelligence Empowering Precise Ideological and Political Education in Universities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/0g6pty95Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Ideological and Political in Colleges and Universities, Precise Ideological and Political Thinking and Politics, Digital Transformation, Cultivate MoralityAbstract
With the rapid development of artificial intelligence, big data, algorithm recommendation, intelligent portrait and other technologies, ideological and political education in colleges and universities is gradually moving from traditional experience-driven to data-driven, intelligent assistance and precise education. Artificial intelligence empowers colleges and universities to accurately think and politics. It is not simply embedding technology in ideological and political classrooms, nor replacing ideological guidance with platform construction. Instead, on the basis of adhering to the fundamental task of cultivating morality, it improves ideological and political education through data collection, academic analysis, resource push, process evaluation and feedback optimisation. Targeted, timely and effective, it provides a new path for the implementation of the fundamental task of cultivating morality. However, in practice, there are still problems such as deviation risk between algorithm technology and value guidance, disconnection between platform construction and practical application, and incompation between teachers' digital literacy and intelligence requirements. In this regard, colleges and universities should improve the data governance mechanism, optimise the construction of intelligent platforms, improve the digital literacy of teachers, adhere to student-centred, and improve the evaluation feedback mechanism, promote the deep integration of artificial intelligence technology and ideological and political education, and realise the organic unity of technological empowerment and value education.
Downloads
References
[1] Zhao, J. Y., & Wu, J. (2025). Practical pathways of AI-empowered personalized learning in American K-12 education. Journal of Comparative Education, (5), 153–166.
[2] Gao, Y., & Wu, Y. W. (2015). Analysis of university counselors' work pressure and its adjustment: An empirical study based on samples from universities in Shaanxi Province. Hubei Social Sciences, (8), 165–169.
[3] Ai, S. Y. (2025). Privacy ethical risks and regulation of human-computer interaction applications from the perspective of government data opening. Huxiang Forum, 38(3), 88–96.
[4] Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. (2021). Provisions on the Construction of Counselor Teams in Regular Higher Education Institutions. Gazette of the Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China, (Z1).
[5] Dong, Y. (2023). Research on precision ideological and political education in universities based on student profiling. Jiangsu Higher Education, (9), 110–113.
[6] Liu, X., & Chao, L. M. (2022). Research on fairness and its evaluation methods in AI governance. Information and Documentation Services, 43(5), 24–33. https://doi.org/ 10.12154/ j.qbzlgz. 2022. 05.007
[7] Jia, X. W. (2025). A preliminary study on the practice of digital profiling of students based on big data precision analysis. Secondary School Mathematics Journal, (10), 43–46.
[8] Luo, P. S. (2020). The era value and construction logic of university governance community. Heilongjiang Researches on Higher Education, (5), 30–34.
[9] Liu, X. Z., & Pang, G. Q. (2025). The value implication, practical difficulties and implementation path of generative AI-empowered ideological and political education. Theory and Practice of Education, 45(30), 40–46.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Education and Educational Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.









