Text‑Based Analysis of Teachers’ Emotional Labor in American Educational Policies: An Exploratory Study Based on Grounded Theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/kjqhn628Keywords:
Teachers’ Emotional Labor, American Educational Policies, Grounded Theory, Policy Discourse Analysis, Accountability SystemAbstract
As a core component of educational work, teachers’ emotional labor has long remained implicit within policy discourses. Adopting grounded‑theory methodology, this study systematically analyzes federal educational laws, state‑level policies and professional standard documents in the United States to explore how teachers’ emotional labor is constructed, its underlying logic and institutional tensions embedded in policy discourses. Through three‑level coding of 52 policy documents, three core categories are identified: instrumental emotional discipline, institutionalization of care‑based ethics, and the accountability paradox of emotional labor. This paper unpacks the underlying mechanism through which American educational policies incorporate teachers’ emotional labor into performance‑management frameworks. The findings reveal a tendency of technical reduction of emotional labor in policy texts, where sophisticated emotional practices are converted into measurable behavioral indicators. While this process grants institutional legitimacy to emotional labor, it erodes its essential ethical‑care connotation. This study establishes a novel analytical framework for understanding the policy‑driven construction of teachers’ emotional labor and puts forward reflective suggestions for educational policy‑making.
Downloads
References
[1] Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. University of California Press.
[2] Ashforth, B. E., & Humphrey, R. H. (1993). Emotional labor in service roles: The influence of identity. Academy of Management Review, 18(1), 88–115.
[3] Grandey, A. A. (2000). Emotion regulation in the workplace: A new way to conceptualize emotional labor. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(1), 95–110.
[4] Morris, J. A., & Feldman, D. C. (1996). The dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of emotional labor. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 986–1010.
[5] Hargreaves, A. (1998). The emotional practice of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(8), 835–854.
[6] Isenbarger, L., & Zembylas, M. (2006). The emotional labour of caring in teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(1), 120–134.
[7] Yin, H. B., & Lee, J. C. K. (2012). Be passionate, but be rational as well: Emotional rules for Chinese teachers' work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(1), 56–65.
[8] Schutz, P. A., & Zembylas, M. (2009). Advances in teacher emotion research: The impact on teachers' lives. Springer.
[9] Tsang, K. K. (2019). Teachers' work intensification and emotional labor. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 18(2), 143–158.
[10] Ye, W. H., & Chen, Q. (2015). Emotional labor of teachers under curriculum reform. Chinese Education & Society, 48(4), 302–315.
[11] Berkovich, I., & Eyal, O. (2017). The mediating role of principals' transformational leadership behaviors in promoting teachers' emotional wellness at work: A study in Israeli schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(2), 316–335.
[12] Ball, S. J. (1993). What is policy? Texts, trajectories and toolboxes. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 13(2), 10–17.
[13] Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 (C. Gordon, Ed.). Pantheon Books.
[14] Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing policy: What's the problem represented to be? Pearson Education.
[15] Nichols, S. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2007). Collateral damage: How high-stakes testing corrupts America's schools. Harvard Education Press.
[16] Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education: How America's commitment to equity will determine our future. Teachers College Press.
[17] Valli, L., & Buese, D. (2007). The changing roles of teachers in an era of high-stakes accountability. American Educational Research Journal, 44(3), 519–558.
[18] Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). SAGE.
[19] National Association of State Directors of Teacher Education and Certification. (n.d.). Model code of ethics for educators. Retrieved July 19, 2026, from https://www. nasdtec. net/ page/ MCEE_ Doc.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Education and Educational Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
