Research on Virtual Scene Development and Multi-Role Collaborative Simulation Training of Post-Earthquake Natech Accidents for Undergraduate Emergency Majors

Authors

  • Bo Yang University of Emergency Management, School of Emergency Technology and Command, Langfang, Hebei, 065201, China
  • Shuaikun Ma University of Emergency Management, School of Emergency Technology and Command, Langfang, Hebei, 065201, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/5fa92882

Keywords:

Na-tech Incident, Post-Earthquake Buildings, Virtual Reality, Practical Instruction, Multi-Role Collaboration

Abstract

Technical accidents triggered by natural disasters—such as gas leaks and explosions in buildings following an earthquake—are characterized by sudden onset, distinct chain reactions, a narrow response window, and high demands for coordination. They serve as crucial scenario resources for undergraduate students in emergency management to understand the risks of compound disasters and mechanisms for multi-agency coordinated response. In response to the requirements for the finalization of the project “Research on the Construction of a Practical Training System for Undergraduate Emergency Management Students Based on Typical Accident and Disaster Virtual Scenarios,” this paper focuses on post-earthquake Na-tech accidents in buildings. By integrating accident case studies, virtual reality technology, and emergency response plan teaching requirements, it develops a practical teaching plan comprising “accident chain analysis—virtual scenario modeling—multi-role collaborative drills—data recording and evaluation feedback.” The study first maps out the chain reaction process involving seismic disturbances, building damage, gas pipeline failure, gas accumulation and leakage, and subsequent explosions and fires; second, it uses Unity 3D to construct virtual scenario resources, including post-earthquake buildings, hazard sources, rescue forces, and interactive triggers; third, it establishes roles such as commanders, search-and-rescue personnel, medical responders, public security and traffic police, and domain experts, forming a collaborative drill process that includes task assignment, execution feedback, consultation and adjustment, and debriefing and optimization; Finally, the study analyzed the scenario’s value in supporting the project’s final deliverables from the perspective of the “Four Categories, Five Levels, and 4R Phases” framework. Research indicates that this approach can transform static, text-based contingency plans into dynamic, interactive, and recordable practical teaching processes. While reducing the risks and costs associated with high-risk scenario drills, it enhances students’ understanding of accident chain mechanisms, emergency response plans, job responsibilities, and collaborative rescue procedures. It can serve as a key component of the virtual scenario case library for typical accidents within the practical teaching system for undergraduate emergency response programs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Pilone, E., Demichela, M., & Camuncoli, G. (2022). Na-Tech risk: A new challenge for local planners. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 90, 223–228.

[2] Zhang, S., Xu, D., Shen, G., et al. (2020). Numerical simulation of Na-Tech cascading disasters in a large oil depot. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(22), 8620. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228620.

[3] Bahamid, A., & Mohd Ibrahim, A. (2022). A review on crowd analysis of evacuation and abnormality detection based on machine learning systems. Neural Computing and Applications, 34(24), 21641–21655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07594-4.

[4] Brignone, M., Santamato, F., Ravina, M., et al. (2025). NaTech database and methodologies for its risk assessment: A review. Natural Hazards, 121(17), 19565–19590. https://doi.org/10. 1007/ s11069-025-07698-9.

[5] Butnariu, M., & Bonciu, E. (2022). Assessment of some hazards associated with dangerous chemicals. In Environmental biotechnology (pp. 1–37). Apple Academic Press.

[6] Marzo, E., Busini, V., & Rota, R. (2015). Definition of a short-cut methodology for assessing the vulnerability of a territory in natural–technological risk estimation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 134, 92–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ress. 2014. 10.008.

[7] Lan, M., Gardoni, P., Weng, W., et al. (2024). Modeling the evolution of industrial accidents triggered by natural disasters using dynamic graphs: A case study of typhoon-induced domino accidents in storage tank areas. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 241, 109656. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/ j.ress. 2024. 109656.

[8] Cha, M., Han, S., Lee, J., et al. (2012). A virtual reality based fire training simulator integrated with fire dynamics data. Fire Safety Journal, 50, 12–24. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j. firesaf. 2012. 04.003.

[9] Wen, Z., Li, J., & Wang, Z. X. (2024). Research on urban disaster emergency management mechanisms and rapid response system construction. Journal of Environmental and Building Engineering, 1(2).

[10] Yu, G., Shi, L., Wang, Y., et al. (2023). A collaborative emergency drill system for urban tunnels using BIM and an agent-based model. Sustainability, 15(18), 13533. https:// doi. org/ 10.3390/su151813533.

[11] Thakur, C. (n.d.). Regulatory frameworks for natural hazard risk management in industries. In Navigating natural hazards risk assessment management: Enhancing disaster resilience through risk analysis and IIoT innovations (p. 237).

[12] Antonioni, G., Bonvicini, S., Spadoni, G., et al. (2009). Development of a framework for the risk assessment of Na-Tech accidental events. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 94(9), 1442–1450. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.ress. 2009. 04. 005

[13] Petrova, E., & Bostenaru Dan, M. (2020). Preface: Natural hazard impacts on technological systems and infrastructures. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 20(10), 2627–2631. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-2627-2020

[14] Marzo, E., Busini, V., & Rota, R. (2015). Definition of a short-cut methodology for assessing the vulnerability of a territory in natural–technological risk estimation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 134, 92–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ress. 2014. 10.008

[15] Petrova, E. (2008). Natural hazards as pre-conditions of technological disasters in Russia. Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards, 2(4), 250–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/17495180802327751.

Downloads

Published

31-07-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Yang, B., & Ma, S. (2026). Research on Virtual Scene Development and Multi-Role Collaborative Simulation Training of Post-Earthquake Natech Accidents for Undergraduate Emergency Majors. Journal of Education and Educational Research, 20(1), 75-83. https://doi.org/10.54097/5fa92882