Sugar Substitute: The Safety and Function of Artificial and Natural Sweeteners
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/ggsmme31Keywords:
Sugar substitutes; artificial sweeteners; natural sweeteners.Abstract
As the global prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and other non-communicable diseases continues to rise, there is growing attention to the importance of a proper diet and managing energy intake. There is a growing desire for sugar alternatives as the harmful consequences of excessive sugar consumption on human health become more and more obvious. This article aims to consolidate current knowledge and research findings on sugar substitutes, with a focus on their digestive processes, taste characteristics, and potential health risks within the human body. The paper provides an examination of various sugar substitutes, including four artificial sweeteners which is aspartame, saccharin, Ace-K, and sucralose, as well as natural sweeteners like stevia and erythritol. Each category is assessed for its suitability in different food applications and associated toxicity studies, drawing comparisons to sucrose. The regulatory framework and safety assessment surrounding sugar substitutes are also discussed, underscoring the importance of understanding their potential health effects. Furthermore, this study explored the benefits of sugar substitutes in terms of calorie control and their potential to improve dietary choices for specific patient groups. The potential impact of sugar substitutes on environmental pollution, gut microbiota, and metabolic syndrome is also examined, highlighting areas that warrant further research. The conflicting results from some studies on the toxicity of sugar substitutes are also addressed, contributing to solve the ongoing controversy surrounding their use.
Downloads
References
Arnone, Djésia, et al. Sugars and Gastrointestinal Health. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2022, 20(9): 1912-24.e7.
Pang, Michelle D., Gijs H. Goossens, and Ellen E. Blaak. The Impact of Artificial Sweeteners on Body Weight Control and Glucose Homeostasis. Frontiers in nutrition, 2021, 7:333.
Mazur, Robert H. Discovery of aspartame. Aspartame. CRC Press, 2020, 3-9.
Mora, Margaux R., and Robin Dando. The sensory properties and metabolic impact of natural and synthetic sweeteners. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 2021, 20(2): 1554-1583.
Basson, Abigail Raffner, Alexander Rodriguez-Palacios, and Fabio Cominelli. Artificial sweeteners: history and new concepts on inflammation. Frontiers in Nutrition, 2021, 8: 746247.
Shalaby, Amany Mohamed, Marwa Awad Abdel hamid Ibrahim, and Adel Mohamed Aboregela. Effect of aspartame on the placenta of adult albino rat. A histological and immunohistochemical study, 2019, 224: 133-141.
Czarnecka, Kamila, et al. Aspartame—true or false? Narrative review of safety analysis of general use in products. Nutrients, 2021, 13(6): 1957.
Ahmad, Samar Y., James Friel, and Dylan Mackay. The effects of non-nutritive artificial sweeteners, aspartame and sucralose, on the gut microbiome in healthy adults: secondary outcomes of a randomized double-blinded crossover clinical trial. Nutrients, 2020, 12(11): 3408.
Mahmood, Ammar A. Razzak, and Sahar B. Al-Juboori. A Review: Saccharin Discovery, Synthesis, and Applications. Ibn AL-Haitham Journal For Pure and Applied Sciences, 2020, 33(2): 43-61.
Jo, Jun Hyeon, et al. Investigation of the regulatory effects of saccharin on cytochrome P450s in male ICR mice. Toxicological Research, 2017, 33: 25-30.
Del Pozo, Susana, et al. Potential effects of Sucralose and saccharin on gut microbiota: a review. Nutrients,2022, 14(8): 1682.
Azeez, Omar Hasan, Suad Yousif Alkass, and Daniele Suzete Persike. Long-term saccharin consumption and increased risk of obesity, diabetes, hepatic dysfunction, and renal impairment in rats. Medicina, 2019, 55(10): 681.
Sánchez-Tapia, Mónica, et al. The development of metabolic endotoxemia is dependent on the type of sweetener and the presence of saturated fat in the diet. Gut microbes, 2020, 12(1): 1801301.
Thomson, Pamela, et al. Short-term impact of sucralose consumption on the metabolic response and gut microbiome of healthy adults. British Journal of Nutrition, 2019, 122(8): 856-862.
Méndez-García, Lucía A., et al. Ten-week sucralose consumption induces gut dysbiosis and altered glucose and insulin levels in healthy young adults. Microorganisms, 2022, 10(2): 434.
Li, Ziqiao, et al. Enhancement of antibiotic resistance dissemination by artificial sweetener acesulfame potassium: Insights from cell membrane, enzyme, energy supply and transcriptomics. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2022, 422: 126942.
Belton, Kerry, Edward Schaefer, and Patrick D. Guiney. A review of the environmental fate and effects of acesulfame‐potassium. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 2020, 16(4): 421-437.
Bian, Xiaoming, et al. The artificial sweetener acesulfame potassium affects the gut microbiome and body weight gain in CD-1 mice. PloS one, 2017, 12(6): e0178426.
Casas-Grajales, Sael, et al. Antioxidant and immunomodulatory activity induced by stevioside in liver damage: In vivo, in vitro and in silico assays. Life sciences, 2019, 224: 187-196.
Ajami, Marjan, et al. Effects of stevia on glycemic and lipid profile of type 2 diabetic patients: A randomized controlled trial. Avicenna journal of Phytomedicine, 2020, 10(2): 118.
Regnat, K., R. L. Mach, and A. R. Mach-Aigner. Erythritol as sweetener—wherefrom and whereto?. Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2018, 102: 587-595.
Witkowski, Marco, et al. The artificial sweetener erythritol and cardiovascular event risk. Nature medicine, 2023, 29(3): 710-718.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







