Interest, Collaboration, Autonomous Learning and satisfaction in the Blended Teaching of Martial Arts

Peng Qin; Hazel Anne Lamadrid-Catublas

doi:10.54097/3tce0d26

Authors

Peng Qin
Hazel Anne Lamadrid-Catublas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/3tce0d26

Keywords:

Blended Teaching, Martial Arts, Interest, Collaboration, Autonomous Learning, satisfaction

Abstract

This study involves two classes of education majors taking a general Martial Arts course, using traditional teaching methods for one class and blended teaching methods for the other over a semester. It aims to compare the learning outcomes in terms of student interest in Martial Arts, cooperative learning abilities in sports, and independent learning abilities. The goal is to explore the feasibility and effectiveness of the online and offline blended teaching mode in university Martial Arts instruction. The result showed that compared to traditional teaching methods, the implementation of blended learning based on online teaching platforms complements students' interest in learning martial arts, as well as their ability to learn independently and collaboratively. With the implementation of personalized learning, interest has increased, and the abilities to learn independently and through hands-on learning have been cultivated, resulting in improved satisfaction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cao, H., Sun, Y., Luo, Y., & Shan, Y. (2022). Research on the Promotion Strategies of Blended Learning Reform in Higher Education. Chemical Engineering Higher Education, 39(02), 12-17.

Zhang, J., & Du, S. (2020). The Connotation, Value Appeal, and Implementation Path of Blended Learning. Teaching and Management,40(09), 11-13.

Bhadri G N, Patil L R.(2022) Blended learning: An effective approach for online teaching and learning[J]. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 35(1): 2394-1707.

Al Qudah A H, Abd Rashid S, Iffah D, et al. (2018).The impact of blended learning in improving fitness elements at sixth grade students in Jordan[J]. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 21(4): 1-9.

Fang, Z. (2015). A Comparative Study of Online Learning and Blended Learning. [Doctoral dissertation, Shaanxi Normal University]

Al Qudah A H, Abd Rashid S, Iffah D, et al.(2018) The impact of blended learning in improving fitness elements at sixth grade students in Jordan[J]. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 21(4): 1-9.

Bayyat M.( 2020) .Blended learning: A new approach to teach ballet technique for undergraduate students[J]. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(2): 69-86.

Al Awamleh (2020).A. Students satisfaction on blended learning in the school of sport sciences[J]. Annals of Applied Sport Science, 8(1): 1-7.

Lopez-Perez, M.V., Perez-Lopez, M.C. & Rodriguez-Ariza, L. (2011). Blended learning in higher education: Students’ perceptions and their relation to outcomes. Computers & Education, 56(3), 818-826.

Vaughan N D, Cleveland-Innes M, Garrison D R. Teaching in blended learning environments: Creating and sustaining communities of inquiry[M]. Athabasca University Press, 2013. Letter Symbols for Quantities, ANSI Standard Y10.5-1968.

Ilic D, Nordin R B, Glasziou P, et al.(2015) A randomised controlled trial of a blended learning education intervention for teaching evidence-based medicine[J]. BMC medical education, 15: 1-10.

Nagaraj C, Yadurappa S B, Anantharaman L T, et al.(2021).Effectiveness of blended learning in radiological anatomy for first year undergraduate medical students[J]. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 43: 489-496.