AI Empowerment of Teachers' Blended Teaching Ability: An Empirical Analysis of the MATE Evaluation System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/0yz5xb30Keywords:
AI Empowerment, Blended Teaching Ability, MATE Evaluation SystemAbstract
This study aims to explore the role of the MATE Multi-Assessment Teaching Evaluation System in empowering teachers' blended teaching abilities through AI. By analyzing questionnaire data from 20 teachers participating in the MATE teaching ability experiment using SPSS, the study evaluated the performance of the MATE system in teaching effectiveness, student engagement, and teacher improvement. The results showed that the MATE system positively impacted teachers' teaching abilities and students' learning experiences across multiple dimensions. This research provides data support for further optimization of the MATE system and empirical evidence for the application of AI technology in education.
Downloads
References
[1] Smith, C., & Gillespie, M. (2023). Research on professional development and teacher change: Implications for adult basic education. In Review of Adult Learning and Literacy, Volume 7 (pp. 205-244). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003417996-7
[2] Brown, C. P., Bay-Borelli, D. E., & Scott, J. (2015). Figuring out how to be a teacher in a high-stakes context: A case study of first-year teachers’ conceptual and practical development. Action in Teacher Education, 37(1), 45-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2014.969849
[3] Johnson, C. C., et al. (2023). Online teaching in K-12 education in the United States: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 93(3), 353-411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543221105550
[4] Anderson, R. E., & Dexter, S. (2021). Technology integration: Crafting a strategic plan for schools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(2), 123-142.
[5] Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311
[6] Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
[7] Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393-416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782536
[8] Hill, J. R., & Hannafin, M. J. (2001). Teaching and learning in digital environments: The resurgence of resource-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(3), 37-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504914
[9] Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
[10] Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810610800610
[11] Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Glazewski, K. D., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2010). Teacher value beliefs associated with using technology: Addressing professional and student needs. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1321-1335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.002
[12] Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
[13] Zhang, D., Zhao, J., Zhou, L., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2004). Can e-learning replace classroom learning? Communications of the ACM, 47(5), 75-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/986213.986216
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Education and Educational Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
