High School English Reading Teaching Strategies Oriented to Deep Learning

Yan Qiu

doi:10.54097/9fc83207

Authors

Yan Qiu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/9fc83207

Keywords:

Deep Learning, Reading Teaching, Core Competence, Educating Value

Abstract

The educational value of English subject is embodied in the core competence of English subject, which can be realized by deep learning based on specific topics and texts. The consistency and integration of teaching and learning determine that students’ deep learning needs teachers' deep instruction and guidance. Based on the connotation and characteristics of deep learning, this paper probes into the connotation and characteristics of senior high school English reading teaching oriented to deep learning, and puts forward the corresponding reading teaching strategies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Carnine D W, Silbert J, Kame' enui E J, et al. (2009). Direct Instruction Reading[M].5th edition. New York: Pearson.

[2] Crowley K, McLaughlin T, Kahn R. (2013). Using direct instruction flashcards and reading racetracks to improve sight word recognition of two elementary students with autism[J]. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 25 (3):297-311.

[3] Hollingsworth J R, Ybarra S E. (2017). Explicit direct instruction (EDI): the power of the well-crafted, well-taught lesson[M]. New York, NY: Corwin Press.

[4] Kamps D, Heitzman-Powell L, Rosenberg N, et al. (2016). Effects of reading mastery as a small group intervention for young children with ASD[J]. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 28(5):703-722.

[5] Lau K L. (2017)Classical Chinese reading instruction: current practices and their relationship with students' strategy use and reading motivation[J]. Teaching and Teacher Education, 64: 175-186.

[6] Stockard J, Wood T W, Coughlin C, et al. (2018). The effectiveness of direct instruction curricula: a meta-analysis of a half century of research[J]. Review of Educational Research, 88 (4):479-507.

[7] Zhao & Qinhua.(2021).RETRACTED: Application of Thematic Context-Based Deep Learning in Foreign Language Teaching. SCIENTIFIC PROGRAMMING,2021(1).

[8] Alderson, J. C., E-L. Haapakangas, A. Huhta, L. Nieminen & R. Ullakonoja. 2015. The Diagnosis of Reading in a Second or Foreign Language[M]. New York: Routledge.

[9] Alderson, J.C.2005.Diagnosing Foreign Language Proficiency: The Interface Between Learning and Assessment[M]. London: Continuum.

[10] Bachman L F & Palmer A S. 2010. Language Assessment in Practice: Developing Language Assessments and Justifying Their Use in the Real World [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[11] Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B & Walker S. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4 [J]. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1):1-48.

[12] Butler D L & Winne P H. 1995. Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis [J]. Review of Educational Research ,65(3):245-281.

[13] Carless D & Boud D. 2018. The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback [J]. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education ,43(8):1315-1325.

[14] Chong S W. 2021. Reconsidering student feedback literacy from an ecological perspective [J]. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(1):92-104.

[15] Daniels L M & Bulut O. 2020. Students' perceived usefulness of computerized percentage-only vs. descriptive score reports: Associations with motivation and grades [J]. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning ,36(2):199-208.

[16] Dela Torre, J. 2011. The generalized DINA model framework [J]. Psychometrika, (2):179-199.

[17] Doe, C.2015.Student interpretations of diagnostic feedback[J]. Language Assessment Quarterly 12:110-135.