Research on Teaching Reform and Practice of Empowering Mechanical Drawing Course in Vocational Colleges with Generative Artificial Intelligence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/x5ea4j44Keywords:
Generative Artificial Intelligence (Generative AI), Mechanical Drawing, Vocational Education, Human-Machine Collaboration, Cognitive Load Theory, Teaching ModelAbstract
Against the backdrop of the "Made in China 2025" strategy, the Mechanical Drawing course in higher vocational education faces challenges where traditional teaching models are disconnected from the needs of industrial digitization. To address this, this study explores the deep integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Generative AI) into the Mechanical Drawing curriculum and proposes a new teaching model tailored for the modern era. The research first establishes the theoretical foundation by drawing upon Cognitive Load Theory and Constructivism Learning Theory, articulating Generative AI's role as a "Cognitive Scaffold." This function effectively reduces students' Extraneous Cognitive Load associated with tedious drawing tasks, allowing them to focus on Higher-Order Design Thinking. Based on this, we designed the "Human-Machine Collaboration and Virtual-Physical Integration" three-stage teaching model. This model reconstructs teaching objectives, shifting the focus from "mastering drawing skills" to "cultivating design thinking and human-machine collaboration capabilities." Implemented through three phases—basic guidance, AI-assisted innovation (concept generation and topology optimization), and deepening of engineering practice (standard correction and physical validation)—the model achieves a fundamental shift in teacher and student roles. The study utilizes an Action Research methodology, combined with quasi-experimental design and mixed methods, for practical validation. This research aims to provide a systematic theoretical framework, implementation pathway, and empirical reference for the intelligent transformation of engineering courses in vocational colleges.
Downloads
References
[1] The state council of China. Made in China 2025[EB/OL]. 2015-05-19[2025-10-18]. Website: https://www. gov.cn/ zhengce/ content/2015-05/19/content_9784.htm.
[2] Sigmund O, Maute K. Topology optimization approaches: a comparative review[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2013, 48(6): 1031-1055.
[3] Bendsøe M P, Sigmund O. Topology Optimization: Theory, Methods, and Applications[M]. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer, 2003.
[4] Wu J, Sigmund O. Topology optimization of multi-scale structures: a review[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2021, 64: 359-393.
[5] Song J, Kim C W. Human–AI collaboration by design: a framework for augmented co-creation[J]. Design Studies, 2024: 101222.
[6] Liu P, Yuan W, Fu J, et al. Pre-train, prompt, and predict: a systematic survey of prompting methods in natural language processing[J]. ACM Computing Surveys, 2023, 55(9): 195:1-195:35.
[7] Sweller J. Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning[J]. Cognitive Science, 1988, 12(2): 257-285.
[8] Paas F, Renkl A, Sweller J. Cognitive load theory and instructional design: recent developments[J]. Educational Psychologist, 2003, 38(1): 1-4.
[9] Sweller J, van Merriënboer J J G, Paas F. Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later[J]. Educational Psychology Review, 2019, 31(2): 261-292.
[10] Jonassen D H, Rohrer-Murphy L. Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments [J]. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1999, 47(1): 61-79.
[11] Prince M. Does active learning work? A review of the research[J]. Journal of Engineering Education, 2004, 93(3): 223-231.
[12] Hmelo-Silver C E. Problem-based learning: what and how do students learn? [J]. Educational Psychology Review, 2004, 16(3): 235-266.
[13] ISO. ISO 1101:2017 Geometrical product specifications (GPS)—Geometrical tolerancing—Tolerances of form, orientation, location and run-out[S]. Geneva: ISO, 2017.
[14] Vukašinović N, Vukašinović I, Edl M, et al. Practical implementation of 3D printing and virtual prototyping in engineering education[J/OL]. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 2024. Available: https://online-journals.org/ index.php/i-jep/article/view/14669.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Education and Educational Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.








