From Pixel to Material: The Application Path of AI-Generated Schemata as Oil Painting Underdrawings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/tdywe125Keywords:
AI-generated Schemata, Oil Painting Underdrawing, Pixel, Materiality, Application Path, Translation, Creative MethodologyAbstract
Against the backdrop of the explosion of AI image generation technology, oil painting creation faces updates in both concept and methodology. Addressing how to effectively transform the non-material AI-generated "pixel" schemata into oil painting "material" entities that carry the artist's emotion and concept, this paper constructs a four-stage workflow of "Screening-Interpretation-Translation-Realization". It elaborates in detail the specific methods, technical challenges, and decision-making processes involved in using AI schemata as creative underdrawings.
Downloads
References
[1] Panofsky, E. (1972). Renaissance and Renascences in Western Art. Harper & Row.
[2] Manovich, L. (2001). The Language of New Media. MIT Press.
[3] Malabou, C. (2008). What Should We Do with Our Brain?. Fordham University Press.
[4] Crowther, P. (2008). The Phenomenology of Digital Art. Palgrave Macmillan.
[5] Zhang, W. (2021). The Gaze of Materials. Shanghai People's Publishing House.
[6] Benjamin, W. (1935). The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.
[7] Deleuze, G. (1988). The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque. University of Minnesota Press.
[8] Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phenomenology of Perception. Gallimard.
[9] Kiefer, A. (2016). Art will survive. Knopf.
[10] Bourriaud, N. (2002). Postproduction. Lukas & Sternberg.
[11] Matisse, H. (1908). Notes of a Painter.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Education and Educational Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
