Cross-Cultural Visual Traps of Generative AI: A Multimodal Discourse Analysis Based on Comparative Prompt Design

Authors

  • Fenglin Wen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/cyk03659

Keywords:

Generative AI, Cross-cultural Advertising, Stereotype, Visual Grammar, Multimodal Discourse Analysis, Cultural Bias.

Abstract

Generative AI is playing an increasingly prominent role in the advertising market. While it boosts production efficiency, it also triggers a series of cultural and ethical risks—the data-driven visual generation mechanism is systematically reproducing cultural stereotypes in cross-cultural advertising. This study takes Midjourney, a text-to-image artificial intelligence model, as the research tool and selects the American, Indian and Chinese markets as research objects. Two groups of prompts, stereotyped and de-stereotyped, are designed to generate 72 advertising samples, revealing the visual production logic of AI from the three dimensions of symbols, styles and narratives. The study finds that AI places non-Western modernity in a marked and interpreted other position: at the symbolic level, it presents a "festivalized representation", with the coverage rate of Chinese Spring Festival symbols reaching 75% and Indian ritual symbols being fully covered and stubbornly remaining even under intervention; at the stylistic level, it forms a "strong stylistic binding", with the intervention success rate in India being only 33.3%, far lower than 83.3% in the United States; at the narrative level, it replicates the "hegemonic narrative template", with 17% of Chinese individual images being endowed with additional emotional burdens. The conclusions of this study provide a critical perspective for understanding the cultural politics in the AI era.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Chen Y W. Beyond ChatGPT: Opportunities, Risks and Challenges of Generative AI [J]. Journal of Shandong University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2023 (03): 127 - 143.

[2] Shan B. Basic Theoretical Propositions of Cross-Cultural Communication [J]. Journal of Central China Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 2011, 50 (01): 103 - 113.

[3] Hu Z L. Multimodality in Social Semiotics Research [J]. Language Teaching and Research, 2007 (01): 1 - 10.

[4] Li M. A Semiotic Interpretation of Cross-Cultural Advertising Communication under the Background of the "Belt and Road" Initiative: A Case Study of 5100 Water Resources [J]. Studies, 2018 (06): 155 - 160.

[5] Barthes R. Image, Music, Text [M]. London: Fontana Press, 1977.

[6] Hofstede G. Culture’s Consequences: Differences in Work-Related Values [M]. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1980.

[7] Lin S D, Vanden Houten P, Zhang Y Q. Sinicization of Global Advertising in the Early 20th Century: A Semiotic Study [J]. Signs & Media, 2018 (01): 84 - 107.

[8] Du S H. A Semiotic Analysis of Apple's Advertising from the Perspective of Cross-Cultural Communication [J]. Youth Journalist, 2017 (21): 74 - 75.

[9] Hu C. A Narrative Study of CCTV Public Service Advertising from the Perspective of Semiotics: A Case Study of CCTV Spring Festival Gala Public Service Advertising in 2019 [J]. Media, 2021 (14): 81 - 83.

[10] Yi W T, Zhang G W. From Efficiency-Driven to Responsibility Symbiosis: Opportunity Upgrading and Risk Governance of Generative AI Advertising Creativity [J]. News World, 2026 (01): 30 - 33.

[11] Gong T, Zhao X, Qiu Y, et al. Application of Generative AI for Real-Time Image Creation in Cross-Cultural Design Communication [C]// Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2025: 65 - 76.

[12] Song M, Chen H, Wang Y, et al. Can AI Fully Replace Human Designers? Matching Effects between Declared Creator Types and Advertising Appeals on Tourists’ Visit Intentions [J]. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 2024, 32: 100892.

[13] Gu C Y, Chang X S Y, Lai J Y, et al. Cyber Models vs. Simulated Images: A Study on the Influence of Model Realism in Generative AI Advertising on Consumers' Cognition and Behavioral Intention [J]. Journal of Marketing Science, 2026, 6 (01): 134 - 152.

[14] Duan C L, Lu H Q. Anthropomorphic Creation of Generative AI Advertising: A Study on the KTI Model Based on Metaphor [J]. Journalism Lover, 2026.

[15] Tang L. AI-Assisted Cross-Cultural Communication Barrier Identification and Solution Research [C]//2025 7th Congress on Human-Computer Interaction, Optimization and Robotic Applications (ICHORA). IEEE, 2025: 1 - 5.

[16] Brandtzaeg P B, Følstad A. Why People Use Chatbots [C]//Internet Science: 4th Conference, INSCI 2017, Thessaloniki, Greece, November 22-24, 2017, Proceedings. Cham: Springer, 2017: 377 - 392.

[17] Sundar S, Limperos A M. Uses and Grats 2.0: New Gratifications for New Media [J]. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 2013, 57 (4): 504 - 525.

[18] Scherr S, Cao B, Jiang L C, et al. Explaining the Use of AI Chatbots as Context Alignment: Motivations behind the Use of AI Chatbots across Contexts and Culture [J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2025, 172: 108738.

[19] Liu C H, Wang W. Animal Symbol Expropriation and Advertising Cross-Cultural Communication in the AI Era [J]. Journal of South-Central Minzu University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 2025, 45 (06): 158 - 166+187 - 188.

[20] Avis G R, Nocco S, Zhao A Q, et al. Guiding AI-Assisted Persona Generation with Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation [J]. Behaviour & Information Technology, 2025: 1 - 29.

[21] Kress G, van Leeuwen T. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design [M]. London: Routledge, 2006.

Downloads

Published

16-04-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Wen, F. (2026). Cross-Cultural Visual Traps of Generative AI: A Multimodal Discourse Analysis Based on Comparative Prompt Design. Journal of Education and Educational Research, 18(1), 939-949. https://doi.org/10.54097/cyk03659