Cross-Cultural Visual Traps of Generative AI: A Multimodal Discourse Analysis Based on Comparative Prompt Design
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/cyk03659Keywords:
Generative AI, Cross-cultural Advertising, Stereotype, Visual Grammar, Multimodal Discourse Analysis, Cultural Bias.Abstract
Generative AI is playing an increasingly prominent role in the advertising market. While it boosts production efficiency, it also triggers a series of cultural and ethical risks—the data-driven visual generation mechanism is systematically reproducing cultural stereotypes in cross-cultural advertising. This study takes Midjourney, a text-to-image artificial intelligence model, as the research tool and selects the American, Indian and Chinese markets as research objects. Two groups of prompts, stereotyped and de-stereotyped, are designed to generate 72 advertising samples, revealing the visual production logic of AI from the three dimensions of symbols, styles and narratives. The study finds that AI places non-Western modernity in a marked and interpreted other position: at the symbolic level, it presents a "festivalized representation", with the coverage rate of Chinese Spring Festival symbols reaching 75% and Indian ritual symbols being fully covered and stubbornly remaining even under intervention; at the stylistic level, it forms a "strong stylistic binding", with the intervention success rate in India being only 33.3%, far lower than 83.3% in the United States; at the narrative level, it replicates the "hegemonic narrative template", with 17% of Chinese individual images being endowed with additional emotional burdens. The conclusions of this study provide a critical perspective for understanding the cultural politics in the AI era.
Downloads
References
[1] Chen Y W. Beyond ChatGPT: Opportunities, Risks and Challenges of Generative AI [J]. Journal of Shandong University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2023 (03): 127 - 143.
[2] Shan B. Basic Theoretical Propositions of Cross-Cultural Communication [J]. Journal of Central China Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 2011, 50 (01): 103 - 113.
[3] Hu Z L. Multimodality in Social Semiotics Research [J]. Language Teaching and Research, 2007 (01): 1 - 10.
[4] Li M. A Semiotic Interpretation of Cross-Cultural Advertising Communication under the Background of the "Belt and Road" Initiative: A Case Study of 5100 Water Resources [J]. Studies, 2018 (06): 155 - 160.
[5] Barthes R. Image, Music, Text [M]. London: Fontana Press, 1977.
[6] Hofstede G. Culture’s Consequences: Differences in Work-Related Values [M]. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1980.
[7] Lin S D, Vanden Houten P, Zhang Y Q. Sinicization of Global Advertising in the Early 20th Century: A Semiotic Study [J]. Signs & Media, 2018 (01): 84 - 107.
[8] Du S H. A Semiotic Analysis of Apple's Advertising from the Perspective of Cross-Cultural Communication [J]. Youth Journalist, 2017 (21): 74 - 75.
[9] Hu C. A Narrative Study of CCTV Public Service Advertising from the Perspective of Semiotics: A Case Study of CCTV Spring Festival Gala Public Service Advertising in 2019 [J]. Media, 2021 (14): 81 - 83.
[10] Yi W T, Zhang G W. From Efficiency-Driven to Responsibility Symbiosis: Opportunity Upgrading and Risk Governance of Generative AI Advertising Creativity [J]. News World, 2026 (01): 30 - 33.
[11] Gong T, Zhao X, Qiu Y, et al. Application of Generative AI for Real-Time Image Creation in Cross-Cultural Design Communication [C]// Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2025: 65 - 76.
[12] Song M, Chen H, Wang Y, et al. Can AI Fully Replace Human Designers? Matching Effects between Declared Creator Types and Advertising Appeals on Tourists’ Visit Intentions [J]. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 2024, 32: 100892.
[13] Gu C Y, Chang X S Y, Lai J Y, et al. Cyber Models vs. Simulated Images: A Study on the Influence of Model Realism in Generative AI Advertising on Consumers' Cognition and Behavioral Intention [J]. Journal of Marketing Science, 2026, 6 (01): 134 - 152.
[14] Duan C L, Lu H Q. Anthropomorphic Creation of Generative AI Advertising: A Study on the KTI Model Based on Metaphor [J]. Journalism Lover, 2026.
[15] Tang L. AI-Assisted Cross-Cultural Communication Barrier Identification and Solution Research [C]//2025 7th Congress on Human-Computer Interaction, Optimization and Robotic Applications (ICHORA). IEEE, 2025: 1 - 5.
[16] Brandtzaeg P B, Følstad A. Why People Use Chatbots [C]//Internet Science: 4th Conference, INSCI 2017, Thessaloniki, Greece, November 22-24, 2017, Proceedings. Cham: Springer, 2017: 377 - 392.
[17] Sundar S, Limperos A M. Uses and Grats 2.0: New Gratifications for New Media [J]. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 2013, 57 (4): 504 - 525.
[18] Scherr S, Cao B, Jiang L C, et al. Explaining the Use of AI Chatbots as Context Alignment: Motivations behind the Use of AI Chatbots across Contexts and Culture [J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2025, 172: 108738.
[19] Liu C H, Wang W. Animal Symbol Expropriation and Advertising Cross-Cultural Communication in the AI Era [J]. Journal of South-Central Minzu University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 2025, 45 (06): 158 - 166+187 - 188.
[20] Avis G R, Nocco S, Zhao A Q, et al. Guiding AI-Assisted Persona Generation with Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation [J]. Behaviour & Information Technology, 2025: 1 - 29.
[21] Kress G, van Leeuwen T. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design [M]. London: Routledge, 2006.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Education and Educational Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.









