International Investment Law Reform under the Sustainable Development Goals: Conflict, Balance and Institutional Reconstruction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/xe68nm76Keywords:
Sustainable development goals, international investment law, investor-state dispute settlement.Abstract
In the context of a fundamental principle of international law for which sustainable development has been widely accepted, this paper studies the structural conflict between sustainable development goals and traditional international investment law. This paper focuses on the imbalance between investor protection and host country regulatory rights. Meanwhile, this paper analyzes the environmental, economic and institutional challenges brought by the current international investment treaties and investor dispute settlement mechanism. Through literature review and typical case analysis, this paper evaluates the practical progress of the international community in rule reconstruction, dispute settlement mechanism reform and regional coordination. The study shows that traditional investment rules often restrict host countries from implementing environmental and industrial policies in line with sustainable development goals, and, points out that institutional reconstruction should be promoted from three ways: strengthening host countries' regulatory rights, reforming Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) mechanism and optimizing performance requirements, so as to provide support for building a more equitable and sustainable international investment governance system.
Downloads
References
[1]Jiang X H. A preliminary discussion on new developments in international investment law: Focusing on how international investment treaties promote sustainable development. Hebei Law Review, 2019, 37(03): 42–56.
[2]Johnson L, Sachs L, Lobel N. Briefing note: Aligning international investment agreements with the Sustainable Development Goals. Georgetown University Law Center & Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment, 2020.
[3]Qian J N. Sustainable development reforms in compliance with international investment law. International Economic and Trade Exploration, 2018, 34(03): 107–120.
[4]Qian J N, Huang S X. Reform of host state regulatory powers under international investment law: An analysis based on the principle of sustainable development. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 20(04): 128–139.
[5]Langford M, Van Harten G, Scott J. Independence, consistency, and transparency defects in investor-state dispute settlement: Empirical evidence from 389 arbitral awards. University of British Columbia Press, 2018.
[6]Su K, Shen W. Environmental protection provisions in international investment agreements: Global trends and Chinese practices. Sustainability, 2023, 15(11).
[7]Ukpe A. Special and differential treatment reform in the WTO. Routledge, 2024.
[8]Damjanovic I. The reform of international investment law: Whose rule of law? European Journal of Risk Regulation, 2024, 15(3): 524–540.
[9]Wilson T. Case studies on investor-state dispute settlement: Public interest implications and transparency shortcomings. Center for International Environmental Law, 2023.
[10]Dorce M. Sustainable development and international investment law: A look at the new generation of international investment agreements. In Law and sustainability: Perspectives for Lithuania and beyond, 2023: 73–93.
[11]Deane F, Woolmer E, Cao S, et al. Trade in the digital age: Agreements to mitigate fragmentation. Asian Journal of International Law, 2024, 14: 154–179.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Education and Educational Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.









