Two-Way Embedding and Resilience Building: The Driving Forces, Effects, and Adaptive Pathways of “Platform-Based Campus Governance”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/dmh1m592Keywords:
Platform-based Campus Governance, Two-way Embedding, University Governance, Resilience BuildingAbstract
Social media platforms have redrawn the terrain of university governance in China. Students embed themselves in the governance ecosystem through these platforms, and their strategies have moved well beyond individual rights advocacy toward participation in public affairs. University authorities, for their part, have begun stepping into online student communities on their own initiative — power no longer merely makes itself present, it works to rebuild legitimacy. Three forces have converged to produce this two-way embedding: the enabling logic of platform technology, mounting pressure on performance-based legitimacy, and the practical learning of the actors involved. Yet the very intensity of interaction that makes governance more responsive also breeds four resilience challenges. Non-routine interaction erodes the authority of formal institutions; emotionalized communication weakens procedural rationality. Instant feedback encourages short-termism, and unequal digital visibility produces a crisis of representation. Meeting these challenges requires a conceptual shift from reactive response to systematic institutional learning, together with a structural coupling mechanism of “platform sensing—institutional feedback.” In day-to-day governance, universities need a workable coexistence of platform interaction and institutional rationality so that dynamic resilience can be built into the governance system.
Downloads
References
[1] Tian, J., & Tian, Y. (2021). The generation logic, social effects, and adaptation strategies of “trending rights protection”. Electronic Government, (12), 90 99.
[2] Ye, J. L., & Xu, Q. (2021). Reproduction of power: An interpretive framework for understanding how Weibo rights protection becomes possible. Journal of Southwest University for Nationalities (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 42(07), 193 200.
[3] Xu, X. C. (2023). Analysis of the “Zhihu based campus governance” phenomenon and its implications for student participation in university governance. Ideological and Theoretical Education, (02), 106 111.
[4] Li, J. Y. (2023). Typical features, evolutionary mechanisms, and response strategies of the “Zhihu based campus governance” phenomenon. College Counselors, (01), 39 43.
[5] Tally, R. (2021). Spatiality (Y. Fang, Trans.). Peking University Press.
[6] Chu, E. K. (2025). On the technical and political nature of algorithms. Guizhou Social Sciences, (04), 4 10.
[7] Giddens, A. (2011). The consequences of modernity (H. Tian, Trans.). Yilin Press.
[8] Song, D., Liu, Y. R., & Zhao, Z. (2019). A review of student power in university governance and its realization paths. Higher Education Science, (4), 41 46.
[9] Jia, X. X., & Ji, Y. (2022). New characteristics of youth online opinion expression: A case study of the construction of the “rational observer” image. People’s Forum·Academic Frontier, (13), 109 111.
[10] Su, G. X. (1988). Rationalization and its limits: An introduction to Weber’s thought. Shanghai People’s Publishing House.
[11] Weber, M. (1997). Economy and society (Volume I) (R. Y. Lin, Trans.). Commercial Press.
[12] Zhang, D. S., Jin, Y. G., Chen, H. W., & et al. (2001). On the doctrine of the mean rationality: Beyond instrumental rationality, value rationality, and communicative rationality. Sociological Research, (2), 33 48.
[13] Dayan, D. (2013). Conquering visibility, conferring visibility: Visibility seekers and media performance. International Journal of Communication, 7, 137 153. https://doi.org/ 10. 5197/ ijoc.2013.07.00.
[14] Zhao, H. M. (2024). Who is the weak? Strategies of visibility contestation, boundary reconstruction, and value reflection. Journal of China University of Geosciences (Social Sciences Edition), 24(05), 145 156.
[15] Habermas, J. (1989). Communication and social evolution (B. S. Zhang, Trans.). Chongqing Publishing House.
[16] Jiang, S., & Lin, H. X. (2024). The crisis of university legitimacy and its resolution: A sociological examination of university rationality based on knowledge. Journal of Anhui Normal University (Social Sciences Edition), 52(05), 126 135.
[17] Liu, Q. (2021). A study on the legitimacy foundation and construction of effective governance in Chinese universities [Dissertation]. Xiamen University.
[18] Dai, Y. C. (2021). From “panopticon” to “solitary gaze”: Foucault, Latour, and spatiality in the age of social media—A reinterpretation of power issues. International Journalism, 43(07), 6 24.
[19] Zhou, Z. Y. (2023). University governance: Conceptual substitution and conceptual flow. Higher Education Research, 44(10), 22 35.
[20] Shen, C., & Pu, X. T. (2023). The modern construction of China’s university governance. Chinese Journal of Educational Science (Chinese and English), 6(04), 62 71.
[21] Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 17 18. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000313
[22] Yang, L. H., Liu, H. Y., & Ma, Y. (2025). Resilient governance: Meaning, paradigm shifts, and a new integrated framework. Governance Studies, 41(03), 4 26+2+158.
[23] Huang, W. W., & Wang, J. H. (2024). University resilience governance in the digital intelligence era: Connotation, objectives, and pathways. Chinese Journal of Higher Education Research, (04), 39 46.
[24] Wen, H., & Li, F. S. (2023). Learning from setbacks: How post crisis learning can promote pre crisis risk prevention—A programmatic grounded analysis based on accident investigation reports. Shanghai Administrative College Journal, 24(03), 18 32.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Education and Educational Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
