Reflection on Teacher Feedback in Hybrid Teaching of Translation

Authors

  • Fuli Li
  • Hong Ge

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/0pkewg89

Keywords:

Teacher Feedback, Reflection, Hybrid Teaching, Translation

Abstract

In the context of the diversity and multi-modality of teaching feedback, the importance of teacher feedback has been impacted by online (computer) feedback and peer feedback, so it's necessary to highlight and give full play to the important role of teacher feedback. After analysis of the characteristics of hybrid translation teaching, the research asserts that all feedback should be given full play to their roles in translation teaching. Teachers are suggested focusing on students' necessities to offer re-feedback and deep feedback by highlighting key and difficult points, meanwhile, to enrich cultural literacy and provide value guidance as well as promoting students to actively perceive, understand and adopt feedback information are the core work of teacher’s feedback to improve translation teaching efficiently and effectively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Jin Binghua. A Dictionary of Marxist Philosophy. Shanghai Lexicographical Publishing House. 2003.6:488.

Wu Wenfang. An Empirical Study on Error Analysis and Teacher Feedback in English Translation [J]. Teacher,2014 (14): 17-19.

Zhao Haijuan. Research on the Application of Peer Review in Translation Teaching for English Majors[J]. Journal of Tianjin Foreign Studies University,2020,27(05):121-135+161.

Liu Rui. Research on the Application of Online Peer Feedback in College English Translation[J].English on Campus, 2021, No.566(22):19-20.

Li Fuli, Ge Hong. Reflection on the Teaching of C-E Translation Based on the Feedback from the Pigai.net[J]. Journal of Hubei Open Vocational College, 2023,36 (07): 162-164.

Wang Lina, Wu Yongyi. An Empirical Study on the Effects of Teacher Feedback and Peer Feedback in Translation Teaching[J]. Journal of Tianjin Normal University,2021 (05): 48-53.

Xu Yingying. The Application and Validity of Peer Feedback in Translation Teaching:the Perspective of Evaluation Discourse Analysis[J]. Foreign Language Testing and Teaching, 2017(2):53-61.

Yang Xiaoyu. A Study on the Feedback Effect of College English Translation Teaching Based on “Juku Correction Network” [D]. Minnan Normal University, 2020:30-59.DOI: 10. 27726/d.cnki.gzzsf.2020.000259.

Cui Ying, Gai Xiaosong, Zhang Shaojie.The Effectiveness of Peer Feedback Method and the Feasibility of Its Application in English Writing Teaching [J]. Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education, 2019(2):3-9.

Zhang Yining, Lin Xiaomeng. A Bibliometric Analysis of China's Peer Feedback Researches Based on Cite-space [J].Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education, 2020 (6): 113-120+11.

Wang Kefei. On the Dual Mediation of Translation[J]. Chinese Translators Journal,2022,43(06):36-44+191.

Zhang Liang. A Study on Peer Feedback in Autonomous Training of Chinese-English Translation [D].Guangdong University of Foreign Studies,2019:20-37.

Zhang Delu.Exploration of a Comprehensive Theoretical Framework for Multimodal Discourse Analysis [J].Foreign Languages in China,2009,6(01):24-30.

Wang Xiaomei, Tian Yan. Empirical Study on Interactive Teaching of College English [J]. Heilongjiang Researches on Higher Education, 2020,38 (01): 152-156. DOI:10. 19903/ j. cnki. cn23-1074/g.2020.01.031.

Shi Hui. Intervening in College Translation Teaching: Connotations and Values [J]. Journal of Taiyuan Normal University (Social Science Edition),2017,16(6):125-128.

Price, M, Handley, K, & Millar, J. et al. Feedback: All That Effort, but What Is the Effect? [J]. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2010,35(3):277-289.

Dai Zhengli. Exploration of Ideological and Political Integration in College English Translation Teaching [J]. Shanghai Journal of Translators,2020(6):61-65.

Downloads

Published

10-12-2023

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Li, F., & Ge, H. (2023). Reflection on Teacher Feedback in Hybrid Teaching of Translation. Journal of Education and Educational Research, 6(3), 102-105. https://doi.org/10.54097/0pkewg89