An Empirical Study on Offensive and Defensive Ability of College Men's Football Teams based on TOPSIS-RSR Comprehensive Evaluation Method

Jingshan Zhang; Lorna A. Espeso

doi:10.54097/6wwn8k19

Authors

Jingshan Zhang
Lorna A. Espeso

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/6wwn8k19

Keywords:

TOPSIS-RSR, College Football, Offensive and Defensive Abilities, Empirical Evidence

Abstract

This study uses the TOPSIS-RSR comprehensive evaluation method to provide 8-week training guidance to 32 college football players, and uses expert interviews, questionnaires and other methods to evaluate the rationality of the 8 offensive and defensive indicators counted by the athletes. It aims to Provide a richer theoretical reference basis for future college football team training. The results show that the TOPSIS-RSR method can only evaluate the results of each team from an objective and quantitative perspective. There may be certain errors in the evaluation process from the final game results, and it requires multiple levels of consideration between teams and players. There are many internal and external uncertain factors such as time, individuals, coaches, etc. Applying the TOPSIS-RSR comprehensive evaluation method to football training technology will help college students with certain football skills to improve their technical level. It is concluded that for athletes whose age, sports level, training years, etc. are variable factors at different stages, the reasonable arrangement of training cycles must be fully considered.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Yin Huagen, Tong Litao, Liu Gang, et al. Research on the application effect of "video feedback teaching method" in the teaching of general table tennis courses in public sports in normal colleges and universities [J]. Journal of Shangrao Normal University, 2021, 41 (6): 108-114.

Zhang Cheng, Wang Xingze. Research on campus football curriculum and case teaching analysis from the perspective of movement learning [J]. Journal of Beijing Sport University, 2017, 40(5): 73-80.

Zhu Jing. Research on the "four-level and three-level" teaching model of public physical education courses in colleges and universities under the CDIO teaching concept - taking football class as an example [J]. Journal of Guangzhou Institute of Physical Education, 2019, 39(5): 121-124. DOI: 10.13830 /j. cnki. cn44-1129/g8.2019.05.027 .

Li Hu. Campus football teaching and training methods - interpretation based on foreign football Small-Sided Games [J]. Journal of Guangzhou Institute of Physical Education, 2020, 40 (2): 124-128.

Xie Jun , Zhuang Wei, Jin Shaonan, et al. Research on game load characteristics of college students’ futsal teaching [J]. Journal of Physical Education, 2018, 25(4): 129-133.

Wei Xuwei, Wang Qiang . Empirical research on the use of case teaching in basketball referee teaching - taking Kashgar University as an example [J]. Journal of Lanzhou University of Arts and Sciences, 2021, 35(5): 123-127. DOI: 10. 13804/ j. cnki. 2095 -6991.2021.05.025.

Zhan Qiang. Training diagnosis and treatment of non-adaptive state of competitive ability of college football players [J]. Sichuan Sports Science, 2016, 35(5): 82-85. DOI: 10. 13932/ j. cnki.sctykx.2016.05.21.

Qiu Lin, Qin Yang . French youth football teaching and training model: theoretical justification and practical reflection [J]. Journal of Shanghai Institute of Sport, 2022, 46 (7): 64-75. DOI: 10. 16099/j.sus .2022.01.05.0007.

Wu Chao. Connotation, characteristics and training paths - Research on tactical awareness in college football teaching [J]. Sports World (Academic), 2017, (2): 170-171.

Liu Guanghu. Discussion on the cultivation of football tactical awareness among college students in general universities[J]. Journal of Yanbian Institute of Education, 2019, 33(5): 104-106.