School Leader Behavior and Teacher Work Task Motivation Towards a Proposed Motivational Training Program for Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/52j2pq14Keywords:
Educational Leadership Behavior, Teacher Motivation, Transformational LeadershipAbstract
This study aims to explore the relationship between school leadership behaviors and teacher motivation in the Chinese educational environment. Research understands the impact of this relationship by examining teacher profiles, assessments of principal leadership behaviors, and measures of teacher motivation levels. Research has found that principals exhibiting caring-oriented behaviors help increase teachers' motivation levels. However, teacher motivation is more influenced by external factors, such as rewards and incentives, rather than intrinsic satisfaction that comes from the job itself. Research also highlights the importance of transformational leadership in stimulating teacher interest and improving performance. Based on the findings, a series of recommendations are put forward to improve teacher motivation and performance, including promoting genuine interest in teaching, providing incentives, creating a teamwork atmosphere, providing professional development opportunities, and making effective use of educational resources. This study provides valuable insights into the relationship between leadership behaviors and teacher motivation in Chinese educational institutions and provides practical suggestions for improvement.
Downloads
References
Bass, B (2018). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. The Free Press.
Blank, W., Weitzel, J. R. & Green, S. G. (2020). A test of the situational leadership theory. Personnel Psychology, 43(3), 579-597.
Creswell &Creswell. (2018). Research Design. International Student Edition. SAGE: Los Angeles, USA.
Goleman, D. (2020). Leadership that gets results. Harvard Business Review, March-April, 78-90.
Bentz, V. J. (2015, August). A view from the top: A thirty year perspective of research devoted to the discovery, description and prediction of executive behavior. Paper presented at the 93rd Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, CA.
Bray, D. W., & Howard, A. (2019). The AT&T longitudinal study of managers. In K. W. Schaie (Ed.), Longitudinal studies of adult psychological development (pp. 112-146). New York: Guilford.
Conger, J. (2017). Learning to lead. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Conger, J., & Benjamin, B. (2015). Building leaders. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Eacott, S. (2013). The return on school leadership preparation and development programmes: A study on Australian university-based programmes. International Journal of Educational Management, 27(7), 686-699.
Evans, D, (2016). Leading from the Middle, Australian Educational Leader, 38(4), 34-37.
Fernet, C. et. al. (n.d.) The work task motivation scale for teachers . Journal of Career Assessment ,16, 256-249.
Fisher. S, (2019). Stress, Control, Worry Prescriptions and the Implications for Health a Work: A Psychological Model. Job control and Worker Health, 205-236.
Goleman, D. (2020). Leadership that gets results. Harvard Business Review, March-April, 78-90.
Gardner, M. (2019). Online learning will change universities by degrees. Parkville, Victoria: The Conversation Media Group. Retrieved from http://the conversation.com/onlinelearning-will-change-universities-by-degrees-9804.
Gardner, W., Cogliser, C., Davis, K., & Dickens, M. (2017). Authentic leadership: A review of the literature and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(6), 1120-1145.
Glickman, C. D. (2015). Leadership for learning: How to help teachers succeed. ASCD.
Guion, R. M. (2017). Personnel assessment selection and placement. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (p. 335). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychology Press.
Gurr, D., & Drysdale, L. (2019). Tensions and dilemmas in leading Australia's schools.
Hambleton, R. K. & Gumpert, R. (2017). The Validity of Hersey and Blanchard’s Theory of Leader Effectiveness. Group & Organization Studies, 7(2), June, 225-242.
Hou Haoxiang & Wang Dan. (2018). A study on the relationship between school innovation climate and teachers' teaching innovation based on a multicluster structural model. Modern Educational Management (09),74-79.
Hoy WK, Miskel CG (2017) Educational administration: Theory, research and practice (8thedn.) McGraw-Hill, Boston.
Liu, S, & Yin, H. (2020) How ethical leadership influences professional learning communities via teacher obligation and participation in decision making. A moderated-mediated analysis. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/ 1741 143220975766.
MBE Newsletter. (2016). Studies: the roles of the school principal and school committee. Retrieved from http:// mbeproject. net/mbe59e.html.
Ogawa, R. & Bossert, S. T. (1995). Leadership as an organizational quality. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31, 224-243.
Portin, B. (2016). The roles that principals play. Educational Leadership, 61, 14-19.
Su, Yanjie, ed. Environmental psychology [M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press.2016.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Education and Educational Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
