Lived Experiences of Teachers & Students on Blended Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/jvnfz492Keywords:
Blended Learning, Lived Experiences, Cultural Sensitivity, Semi-structured Interviews, Henan Province, Teachers, College StudentsAbstract
This study explores the implementation of blended learning in Henan Province, China, through the lived experiences of teachers and students. Drawing on a phenomenological approach using semi-structured interviews, the research investigates 1) the current status of blended learning implementation, 2) teachers' experiences with blended learning, and 3) students' perspectives on the impact of blended learning on student outcomes. The study aims to identify best practices and culturally-sensitive strategies for optimizing blended learning in the province. Literature review reveals the transformative potential of blended learning, alongside considerations for cultural context, technology integration, and effective teacher training. The research employs thematic analysis to draw insights from interviews with 10 teachers and 20 students at two selected universities in Henan, China. Addressing critical gaps in geographic context, this study holds the potential to inform and enhance blended learning practices in Henan Province and foster deeper learning experiences for both teachers and students.
Downloads
References
Cronjé, J. C. (2022). Blending behaviourism and constructivism: A case study in support of a new definition of blended learning. Progressio, 41(1), 19-pages.
Dakhi, O., JAMA, J., & IRFAN, D. (2020). Blended learning: a 21st century learning model at college. International Journal Of Multi Science, 1(08), 50-65.
Fisher, R., Perényi, A., & Birdthistle, N. (2021). The positive relationship between flipped and blended learning and student engagement, performance and satisfaction. Active Learning in Higher Education, 22(2), 97-113.
Chen, J., Zhou, J., Wang, Y., Qi, G., Xia, C., Mo, G., & Zhang, Z. (2020). Blended learning in basic medical laboratory courses improves medical students’ abilities in self-learning, understanding, and problem solving. Advances in physiology education, 44(1), 9-14.
Cai, J., Yang, H. H., Gong, D., MacLeod, J., & Zhu, S. (2019). Understanding the continued use of flipped classroom instruction: a personal beliefs model in Chinese higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 31, 137-155.
Finardi, K. R. (2019). Internationalization and multilingualism in Brazil: possibilities of Content and Language Integrated Learning andIntercomprehension approaches. International Journal of Educational and Pedagogical Sciences, 13(5), 667-671.
Anthony, B., Kamaludin, A., Romli, A., Raffei, A. F. M., Phon, D. N. A. E., Abdullah, A., & Ming, G. L. (2022). Blended learning adoption and implementation in higher education: A theoretical and systematic review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1-48.
Abusalim, N., Rayyan, M., Jarrah, M., & Sharab, M. (2020). Institutional adoption of blended learning on a budget. International Journal of Educational Management, 34 (7), 1203-1220.
Al-Maroof, R., Al-Qaysi, N., Salloum, S. A., & Al-Emran, M. (2021).Blended learning acceptance: A systematic review of information systems models. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1-36.
Cunningham, D. (2021). A case study of teachers’ experiences of blended teaching and learning. Journal of Online Learning Research, 7(1), 57-83.
Heilporn, G., Lakhal, S., & Bélisle, M. (2021). An examination of teachers’ strategies to foster student engagement in blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, 1-25.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Education and Educational Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.









