Reflection on the Policy of General and Vocational Diversion in Senior High Schools in China

Hongyuan Luo; Anding Yu

doi:10.54097/tchdzp76

Authors

Hongyuan Luo
Anding Yu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/tchdzp76

Keywords:

General Job Diversion, General-vocational Ratio, Integration of General and Vocational Education

Abstract

In senior high school, general education and vocational education advocate "roughly equal" in enrollment scale, which is the consistent policy of separating general education from vocational education in China in recent 40 years. In view of this policy, the author makes a rational analysis from three dimensions: educational equity, social development and personal development. In order to promote the all-round development of people and the sustainable development of society, the proportion of general posts should be determined according to local conditions; Distribute according to reason, adjust educational resources and improve the quality of running schools; According to the situation, the combination of general education and vocational education, and the construction of smooth educational channels, this paper puts forward some suggestions on the diversion of general education and vocational education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

China Youth Daily published an article. Behind the anxiety of general job diversion is academic discrimination [N]. China Youth Daily, 2021-12-20.

Zhu Xinzhuo, Zhao Kuankuan. Reflection and reform on the policy that the scale of general posts in senior high schools in China is roughly equivalent [J]. China Education Journal, 2020(07):11-16+102.

Zhejiang Provincial Department of Education. Notice on Doing a Good Job in the Enrollment of Secondary Vocational Schools in 2008 [EB/OL]. (2008-05-01) [2020-02-10]

Peng Hongbin, He Fang. The trend of students' resources and the integration strategy in the next 20 years [J]. Educational Science Research, 2022(11):12-18.

Zhou Jinping. After Opportunities-How to Distribute and Implement Equal Opportunities [J]. Tianjin Social Sciences, 2007 (6): 29,30.

Shen Youlu. Who goes to the secondary vocational school? Who goes to Pugao? What is the difference? [J]. China Vocational and Technical Education, 2017 (11): 65-67.

Liu Xuedong, Wei Ya. From "Diversion" to "Coordination": the value implication and practical requirements of "the ratio of general education to vocational education is roughly equal" [J]. Education and Vocational Education, 2022(23):5-12.

Zhu Xinzhuo, Chen Junyi. Problems in the relationship between general education and vocational education in China and the direction of reform: Enlightenment of the relationship between general education and vocational education in Germany to China [J]. Educational Research and Experiment, 2013 (4): 11-15.

Liu Xuedong, Wei Ya. From "Diversion" to "Coordination": the value implication and practical requirements of "the ratio of general education to vocational education is roughly equal" [J]. Education and Vocational Education, 2022(23):5-12.

Yaoyao Hu, Wu Qiong, Lin Kesong. The practical resistance and advancing path of the general-vocational separation in senior high school entrance examination [J]. Education and occupation, 2022(05):35-40.

the NPC Standing Committee. People's Republic of China (PRC) Vocational Education Law [Z] .2022-04-20.

He Yong Yang, Zhu Qiao. Diversion and integration of general education and vocational education from the perspective of educational equity [J]. Jiangsu Higher Education, 2019(06):93-98.

Wang Qin. Analysis of the connotation of coordinated development of secondary and higher vocational education [J]. Vocational Education Forum, 2012 (10).