An Overview of Moral Psychology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/gn47pf39Keywords:
Moral, Moral PsychologyAbstract
Moral process has been a complex process since ancient times, and studying and understanding morality is beneficial for us to solve most of the moral dilemmas in our society, therefore, this paper mainly focuses on the introduction of moral emotions as well as the process of moral judgment, and discusses the relevant research and theories of moral psychology.
Downloads
References
Chartrand, T. L. & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 893–910.
Green, J. D. (2008). The secret joke of Kant's soul. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology, Vol. 3. The neuroscience of morality: Emotion, brain disorders, and development (pp. 35–80). MIT Press.
Haidt, J., & Bjorklund, F. (2008). Social intuitionists answer six questions about moral psychology. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology, Vol. 2. The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity (pp. 181–217). MIT Press.
Haidt. J.(2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 100, 815.3.
Kesebir, S., & Haidt, J. (2010). Morality (in Handbook of Social Psychology). Social Science Research Network.
Lindsay-Hartz, J., Rivera, J.D., & Mascolo, M.F. (1995). Differentiating guilt and shame and their effects on motivation.
Orth, U.R., Berking, M., & Burkhardt, S. (2006). Self-Conscious Emotions and Depression: Rumination Explains Why Shame but Not Guilt is Maladaptive. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1608 - 1619.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Education and Educational Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
