A Genre Analysis of Textbook Discourse

-- A Case Study of A Travel Journal from Unit 3 Book 3 for Senior High by People’s Education Press

Authors

  • Na Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/4rmnv305

Keywords:

Discourse Analysis, Genre Analysis, Textbook Discourse, The Sydney School

Abstract

As one of the suggestions on teaching specified in New Curriculum Standard is studying the texts thoroughly and grasping the core teaching content. As part of the curriculum content, text types which fulfil specific social purposes are used to specify what students should be able to achieve with language if they are to meet the stated outcomes of the syllabus. When texts share the same general purpose in the culture, they will often share the same obligatory and optional structural elements and so they belong to the same genre or text type. Then it's much easier to produce an appropriate text when you know its structure, and for this reason awareness of text types is now part of the curriculum. This study, selecting the reading material for senior high school students: A Travel Journal from Unit 3 Book 3 published by People’s Education Press, analyzing the structural elements in this text based on Martin’s genre analysis in the Sydney School, concludes that, to facilitate the cultivation of students’ core literacy, teachers are advised to try to answer three fundamental questions of “what, why and how” during text analysis and teaching design, which are consistent with field, tenor and mode from Halliday’s (1978) Register Theory respectively and can be answered by considering the genre and three meta-functions of language including ideational, interpersonal and textual, which is achieved by transitivity system, voice, polarity; mood, modality system; theme-rheme structure, information structure and textual cohesion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Artemeva, N. (2008), ‘Toward a unified theory of genre learning’, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 22, 160-85.

Bhatia, V. K. 1993. Analyzing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.

Du Jinbang. Text Analysis Tutorial[M].Wuhan: Wuhan University Press, 2013: 160.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1978c), Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1989), ‘Register variation’, in M. A. K. Halliday and R. Hasan. Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-semiotic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 29-43.

Martin, J. R. (1984), ‘Language, register and genre’, in F. Christie (ed.), Language Studies: Children's Writing: Reader. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press, pp. 21-9.

Martin, J. R. and Rose, D. (2008), Genre Relations: Mapping Culture. London: Equinox.

Miller, C. R. (1984), ‘Genre as social action’, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151-67. Reprinted in A. Freedman and P. Medway (eds) (1994). Genre and the New Rhetoric, London: Taylor & Francis, pp. 23-42.

Miller, C. R. and Bazerman, C. (2011), ‘Gêneros textuais (Genres)’. Available at www.nigufpe.com.br/serie-bate-papo-academico-vol-1-generos-textuais, accessed 12 September 2011.

Rose, D. (2012), ‘Genre in the Sydney school’, in J. P. Gee and M. Handford (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge, pp. 209-25.

Rose, D. and Martin, J. R. (2012), Learning to Write/Reading to Learn: Genre, Knowledge and Pedagogy in the Sydney School. London: Equinox.

Schryer, C. (2011), ‘Investigating texts in their social contexts: The promise and peril of rhetorical genre studies’, in D. Starke-Meyerring, A. Paré, N. Artemeva, M. Horne and L. Yousoubova (eds), Writing in Knowledge Societies. Perspectives on Writing. Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press, pp. 31-52. Available at http:// wac. colostate. edu/books/winks/, accessed 2 April 2012.

Swales, J. M. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings[M]. Cambridge: CUP.

Swales, J. M. (2004), Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

The Ministry of Education. New English Curriculum for Chinese Senior High Schools [M]. Beijing: People's Education Press, 2020.

Ventola, Eija 1995. Generic and Register Qualities of Texts and Their Realization [A]. In Peter H. Fries & Michael Gregory (eds.). Discourse in Society: Systemic Functional Perspectives [C]. Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Wang Zongyan, English-Chinese Dictionary of Applied Linguistics [M], Changsha: Hunan Education Publishing House, 1988.

Downloads

Published

30-07-2024

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Wang, N. (2024). A Genre Analysis of Textbook Discourse : -- A Case Study of A Travel Journal from Unit 3 Book 3 for Senior High by People’s Education Press. Journal of Education and Educational Research, 9(3), 299-302. https://doi.org/10.54097/4rmnv305