Influence of Contemporary Philosophical Teaching Approaches on Students’ Learning Performance in Selected Universities in China: Basis for an Enhanced Teaching Program
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/0qpw2w37Keywords:
Contemporary Philosophical Teaching Approaches, Student Learning Performance, Educational Strategies, Teaching Program EnhancementAbstract
This study explores the influence of contemporary philosophical teaching approaches on students' learning performance in selected universities in China. The research specifically examines the extent to which philosophical approaches like Perennialism, Essentialism, Progressivism, Reconstructionism, and Behaviorism are manifested among educators and how these approaches impact students' engagement, attitudes, assignment quality, and grades. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, the study involved a comprehensive survey of university teachers, followed by a quantitative analysis of the data. The results indicate that Progressivism and Reconstructionism are the most prevalent approaches, showing significant correlations with enhanced student engagement and improved learning outcomes. However, Behaviorism demonstrated a notable predictive ability in influencing students' performance through structured reinforcement strategies. The study highlights the importance of integrating diverse teaching methodologies to cater to varying student needs and promote holistic educational development. These findings provide a basis for proposing a more enriched and adaptable teaching program aimed at fostering a more interactive and student-centered learning environment.
Downloads
References
[1] Anderson, J. (2019). Education for social change: A reconstructionist approach. Educational Studies Journal.
[2] Brown, L., & Williams, S. (2020). Progressive education and student engagement: A case study. Journal of Experiential Education.
[3] Chen Xiaoqing, Sun Xiuwei. (2022). Research on the improvement of teachers' ideological and political work ability in colleges and universities under the perspective of "Five Educational Programs". Modern Vocational Education, (15), 76-78.
[4] Chen Xia, Yang Ying, Ou Maoqin. (2024). The nature and value of moral education from the perspective of educational philosophy. Educational Exploration, (06), 80-82.
[5] Chang Tongshan, Zhao Junjing, Zhao Lei. (2024). The practice of cooperation between universities and middle schools in the United States to cultivate top-notch innovative talents. Research on Higher Engineering Education, (03), 9-14, 72.
[6] Cui Xiangping, Wei Ling. (2024). The turning of educational philosophy in the era of artificial intelligence: On the rationality and possibility of existential education. Electronic Education Research, 45(04), 11-17. https://doi.org/ 10. 13811/ j. cnki.eer.2024.04.002.
[7] Smith, A. (2018). Perennialism and the development of critical thinking skills. Journal of Liberal Education.
[8] Zhang, W. (2020). Examining the effectiveness of perennialism and essentialism in 21st-century classrooms. Asian Education Studies, 5(1), 13-26.
[9] Liu Xinlong, Qi Wanxue. (2024). Educational Research and Experiment, (03):58-68.
[10] Peng Zhengmei, Wu Yuezhu, Mao Xiao. (2024). Rationality as human dignity: On the necessity of education in Kant's sense is global citizenship education[J]. Journal of Educational Sciences of Hunan Normal University,23(03):5-16.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Education and Educational Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.









