On the Educational Punishment Boundary of Maintaining Students' Dignity

Authors

  • Yiwen Sun
  • Wanling Yang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/aaqx3v33

Keywords:

Educational Punishment, Boundary, Legislative Dignity

Abstract

In recent years, educational punishment has become a buzzword. While discussing the positive role of educational punishment, we must adhere to its boundaries. Otherwise, it may be distorted and turned into its opposite. Specifically, the author believes that if educational punishment is to take the full dignity of students as its boundary and limit, then—it should delineate its principle boundary based on "human as an end," upholding students' "legislative dignity"; it should delineate its choice boundary by viewing students as students, aligning with their "abilities," and upholding their "will dignity"; and it should delineate its execution boundary by safeguarding fairness in school life, providing universal equality and individualized care, and upholding students' "achievement dignity."

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] kant. On Pedagogy [M]. Zhao Peng, He Zhaowu, Translation. Shanghai: Shanghai People 's Publishing House, 2005 : 17.

[2] Xiong Jinju. Educational Understanding and Human Self-Return - A Review of Liu Tiefang 's ' What is Good Education : A Philosophical Interpretation of School Education ' [J]. Journal of Educational Science, Hunan Normal University, 2015 (4) : 2 ; 129.

[3] Jin Sheng-hung. Education and Human Dignity [J]. Journal of Northwest Normal University (Social Science Edition), 2000 (1) : 64-67.

[4] IdoWeijers.Punishment and Upbringing:considerations for an educative justification of punishment[J].Journal of Moral Education, 2000(1):62-73.

Downloads

Published

30-10-2024

Issue

Section

Articles