On the Educational Punishment Boundary of Maintaining Students' Dignity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/aaqx3v33Keywords:
Educational Punishment, Boundary, Legislative DignityAbstract
In recent years, educational punishment has become a buzzword. While discussing the positive role of educational punishment, we must adhere to its boundaries. Otherwise, it may be distorted and turned into its opposite. Specifically, the author believes that if educational punishment is to take the full dignity of students as its boundary and limit, then—it should delineate its principle boundary based on "human as an end," upholding students' "legislative dignity"; it should delineate its choice boundary by viewing students as students, aligning with their "abilities," and upholding their "will dignity"; and it should delineate its execution boundary by safeguarding fairness in school life, providing universal equality and individualized care, and upholding students' "achievement dignity."
Downloads
References
[1] kant. On Pedagogy [M]. Zhao Peng, He Zhaowu, Translation. Shanghai: Shanghai People 's Publishing House, 2005 : 17.
[2] Xiong Jinju. Educational Understanding and Human Self-Return - A Review of Liu Tiefang 's ' What is Good Education : A Philosophical Interpretation of School Education ' [J]. Journal of Educational Science, Hunan Normal University, 2015 (4) : 2 ; 129.
[3] Jin Sheng-hung. Education and Human Dignity [J]. Journal of Northwest Normal University (Social Science Edition), 2000 (1) : 64-67.
[4] IdoWeijers.Punishment and Upbringing:considerations for an educative justification of punishment[J].Journal of Moral Education, 2000(1):62-73.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Education and Educational Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.









